Post-response: Setting limits to the poetry lesson
| dc.contributor.author | Bender, Stuart | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T13:06:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T13:06:40Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2014-05-13T20:00:36Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Bender, S. 2008. Post-response: Setting limits to the poetry lesson. Interpretations. 40: pp. 30-41. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/28692 | |
| dc.description.abstract |
While students of English are required to engage with texts from a variety of theoretical perspectives, these positions are often refracted through a personal-ethical paradigm which uses the text as a surface on which students' moral selves can be displayed for the corrective gaze of the teacher. A model of reading as productive practice, on the other hand, suggests that there is no innate reason for a text (poetic or otherwise) to be read in this way. In this paper the author offers an alternative mode of study, drawing on historical- philological practice, which allows students to approach poetry from a perspective that brackets the notion of the personal response | |
| dc.publisher | English Teachers Association of Western Australia | |
| dc.subject | pedagogy | |
| dc.subject | historical-philological | |
| dc.subject | poetry | |
| dc.subject | English teaching | |
| dc.title | Post-response: Setting limits to the poetry lesson | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dcterms.source.volume | 40 | |
| dcterms.source.startPage | 30 | |
| dcterms.source.endPage | 41 | |
| dcterms.source.issn | 13288881 | |
| dcterms.source.title | Interpretations | |
| curtin.department | ||
| curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |
