Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBender, Stuart
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:06:40Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:06:40Z
dc.date.created2014-05-13T20:00:36Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationBender, S. 2008. Post-response: Setting limits to the poetry lesson. Interpretations. 40: pp. 30-41.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/28692
dc.description.abstract

While students of English are required to engage with texts from a variety of theoretical perspectives, these positions are often refracted through a personal-ethical paradigm which uses the text as a surface on which students' moral selves can be displayed for the corrective gaze of the teacher. A model of reading as productive practice, on the other hand, suggests that there is no innate reason for a text (poetic or otherwise) to be read in this way. In this paper the author offers an alternative mode of study, drawing on historical- philological practice, which allows students to approach poetry from a perspective that brackets the notion of the personal response

dc.publisherEnglish Teachers Association of Western Australia
dc.subjectpedagogy
dc.subjecthistorical-philological
dc.subjectpoetry
dc.subjectEnglish teaching
dc.titlePost-response: Setting limits to the poetry lesson
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume40
dcterms.source.startPage30
dcterms.source.endPage41
dcterms.source.issn13288881
dcterms.source.titleInterpretations
curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record