View Item 

Testing the generality of above-ground biomass allometry across plant functional types at the continent scale

Access Status
Open access
Authors
Paul, K.
Roxburgh, S.
Chave, J.
England, J.
Zerihun, Ayalsew
Specht, A.
Lewis, T.
Bennett, L.
Baker, T.
Adams, M.
Huxtable, D.
Montagu, K.
Falster, D.
Feller, M.
Sochacki, S.
Ritson, P.
Bastin, G.
Bartle, J.
Wildy, D.
Hobbs, T.
Larmour, J.
Waterworth, R.
Stewart, H.
Jonson, J.
Forrester, D.
Applegate, G.
Mendham, D.
Bradford, M.
O'Grady, A.
Green, D.
Sudmeyer, R.
Rance, S.
Turner, J.
Barton, C.
Wenk, E.
Grove, T.
Attiwill, P.
Pinkard, E.
Butler, D.
Brooksbank, K.
Spencer, B.
Snowdon, P.
O'Brien, N.
Battaglia, M.
Cameron, D.
Hamilton, S.
McAuthur, G.
Sinclair, J.
Date
2015
Type
Journal Article

Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Paul, K. and Roxburgh, S. and Chave, J. and England, J. and Zerihun, A. and Specht, A. and Lewis, T. et al. 2015. Testing the generality of above-ground biomass allometry across plant functional types at the continent scale. Global Change Biology. 22 (6): pp. 2106-2124.
Source Title
Glob Chang Biol
DOI
School
Centre for Crop Disease Management
Remarks

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Paul, K. and Roxburgh, S. and Chave, J. and England, J. and Zerihun, A. and Specht, A. and Lewis, T. et al. 2015. Testing the generality of above-ground biomass allometry across plant functional types at the continent scale. Global Change Biology. 22 (6): pp. 2106-2124, which has been published in final form at http://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13201. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving at http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-820227.html#terms

URI
Collection
Abstract

Accurate ground-based estimation of the carbon stored in terrestrial ecosystems is critical to quantifying the global carbon budget. Allometric models provide cost-effective methods for biomass prediction. But do such models vary with ecoregion or plant functional type? We compiled 15,054 measurements of individual tree or shrub biomass from across Australia to examine the generality of allometric models for prediction above-ground biomass. This provided a robust case study because Australia includes ecoregions ranging from arid shrublands to tropical rainforests, and has a rich history of biomass research, particularly in planted forests. Regardless of ecoregion, for five broad categories of plant functional type (shrubs; multi-stemmed trees; trees of the genus Eucalyptus and closely related genera; other trees of high wood density; and other trees of low wood density), relationships between biomass and stem diameter were generic. Simple power-law models explained 84-95% of the variation in biomass, with little improvement in model performance when other plant variables (height, bole wood density), or site characteristics (climate, age, management) were included. Predictions of stand-based biomass from allometric models of varying levels of generalisation (species-specific, plant functional type) were validated using whole-plot harvest data from 17 contrasting stands (range: 9 to 356 Mg ha(-1) ). Losses in efficiency of prediction were < 1% if generalised models were used in place of species-specific models. Furthermore, application of generalised multi-species models did not introduce significant bias in biomass prediction in 92% of the 53 species tested. Further, overall efficiency of stand-level biomass prediction was 99%, with a mean absolute prediction error of only 13%. Hence, for cost-effective prediction of biomass across a wide range of stands, we recommend use of generic allometric models based on plant functional types. Development of new species-specific models is only warranted when gains in accuracy of stand-based predictions are relatively high (e.g. high-value monocultures). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.