Managerial ownership and firm performance in Thailand: An empirical analysis
Access Status
Authors
Date
2010Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
ISSN
School
Collection
Abstract
This study investigates whether managerial share ownership serves to enhance or detract from firm performance in listed companies in Thailand. The convergence-of-interest hypothesis asserts that firm value increases as management ownership rises. On the other hand, when managers own a substantial fraction of the firm shares, then voting power or other influence may satisfy other non-value-maximising objectives without endangering other positions. This gives rise to the entrenchment hypothesis, which suggests the excessive insider ownership has negative impact on corporate performance. The results of this study support both the alignment and entrenchment efforts and therefore the existence of a non-linear relationship between firm performance and managerial ownership. Firm size and industry are also shown to impact significantly on firm performance in Thailand.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Guo, Fei (2008)Concentrated corporate ownership prevails in most countries, so the relationship between controlling shareholders and minority shareholders is an important principle-agent problem. Tunnelling, the transfer of assets and ...
-
Lukviarman, Niki (2004)This study looks at the relationship between ownership structure, monitoring and firm performance. The research employed the agency theory hypothesised by Jensen and Meckling (1976) from the view of contractual relationships ...
-
Prabowo, Muhammad Agung (2010)The study investigates the effect of the compositions of board of directors on firm performance in Indonesia. This country offers a specific institutional environment, which provides a natural setting to further examine ...