Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHowie, Erin
dc.contributor.authorStraker, Leon
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T10:26:59Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T10:26:59Z
dc.date.created2016-03-02T19:30:19Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationHowie, E. and Straker, L. 2015. Rates of attrition, non-compliance and missingness in randomized controlled trials of child physical activity interventions using accelerometers: A brief methodological review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. [In Press].
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/2897
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jsams.2015.12.520
dc.description.abstract

© 2016 Sports Medicine Australia. Objectives: The purpose of this brief review was to describe the missingness, from both attrition and non-compliance, during physical activity randomized controlled trials among children which have used accelerometers to measure physical activity. Design: Systematic review. Methods: Using a previously published search strategy, an updated search of the literature was performed in the MEDLINE database for articles published from 1996 to February 2015 identifying physical activity RCTs in children (ages 2-18) measuring physical activity using accelerometers. Rates of attrition and non-compliance were extracted from identified articles. Twenty-three independent studies provided complete attrition and non-compliance data and were included. Results: The mean attrition rate was 11.5% (SD 10.1%, range 0-30.9%). The mean accelerometer non-compliance rate at baseline was 22.7% (SD 16.4%, range 1.7-67.8%) and 29.6% (SD 19.4%, range 3.3-70.1%) at follow-up. The mean total study missingness was 37.4% (SD 20.2%, range 3.3-75.4%) and ranged from 3.3% to 75.4%. There was large variation in how missingness was accounted for between studies. There were no statistically significant differences in missingness between study characteristics including sample size, participant age, intervention setting, duration of follow-up, whether physical activity was the primary outcome, and weartime compliance criteria. Conclusions: Missingness is common among randomized controlled trials using accelerometry in children and is currently handled inconsistently. Researchers must plan for high levels of missingness in study design and account for missingness in reporting and analyses of trial outcomes.

dc.titleRates of attrition, non-compliance and missingness in randomized controlled trials of child physical activity interventions using accelerometers: A brief methodological review
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.issn1440-2440
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport
curtin.departmentSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record