What Use Is Federalism Anyway?
MetadataShow full item record
The continuing decline of Australian federalism as a system of divided jurisdiction raises important questions about the optimal constitution for Australia. As a contribution to that discussion, this paper reviews some of the main arguments for a federal order. Although superficially attractive, the well-worn regional diversity argument for federalism does not stand up well to closer examination. One alternative basis for a normative theory of federalism is that divided jurisdiction makes a valuable contribution to the protection of individual rights. This argument, though, turns out to be inspired by a highly selective reading of the Federalist papers, and to be based on logic and evidence that are not particularly compelling. Pushed further, this argument is a version of the ‘market protecting federalism’ model of public choice theory — whose logic is coherent but whose persuasiveness is entirely dependent on acceptance of a very particular set of assumptions. Alternative visions of federalism building on either the preferences–mobility model or the laboratory federalism model are less normatively constricted, but are not without their practical difficulties.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Manison, Gary F. (2015)Australian policing before 1980 was a State responsibility, but it is now shared with the Commonwealth. Policing underwent a paradigm shift, driven by the Commonwealth and abnormally in the course of Australian federalism, ...
Pinto, Dale (2013)The taxation of superannuation arrangements in Australia has undergone many changes, particularly since 1983. In the lead-up to the federal Budget in May 2013 and the federal election in September 2013, there are rumours ...
Fenna, Alan (2011)Redistribution from wealthier to less-wealthy jurisdictions is a common if not virtually universal practice in federal systems and accords with some of the key principles of federalism. However, it easily becomes controversial ...