Where should stepped-wedge designs be placed in the evidence hierarchy?: Using the “within-wedge” analysis approach to generate evidence of possible bias
| dc.contributor.author | Hill, Anne-Marie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hemming, K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Girling, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Haines, T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bulsara, M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Deeks, J. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T13:14:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T13:14:05Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2016-02-01T00:47:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Hill, A. and Hemming, K. and Girling, A. and Haines, T. and Bulsara, M. and Deeks, J. 2014. Where should stepped-wedge designs be placed in the evidence hierarchy?: Using the “within-wedge” analysis approach to generate evidence of possible bias. BMC Health Services Research. 14 (Suppl 2): pp. 54. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/29633 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-S2-P54 | |
| dc.publisher | BioMed Central | |
| dc.title | Where should stepped-wedge designs be placed in the evidence hierarchy?: Using the “within-wedge” analysis approach to generate evidence of possible bias | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dcterms.source.volume | 14 | |
| dcterms.source.number | Suppl 2 | |
| dcterms.source.startPage | 1 | |
| dcterms.source.endPage | 1 | |
| dcterms.source.issn | 1472-6963 | |
| dcterms.source.title | BMC Health Services Research | |
| curtin.note |
This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons license | |
| curtin.department | School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science | |
| curtin.accessStatus | Open access |
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||