Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPenman, E.
dc.contributor.authorBreen, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorHewitt, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorPrigerson, H.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:20:25Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:20:25Z
dc.date.created2014-07-24T20:00:24Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationPenman, E. and Breen, L. and Hewitt, L. and Prigerson, H. 2014. Public Attitudes About Normal and Pathological Grief. Death Studies. 38 (8): pp. 510-516.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/30581
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/07481187.2013.873839
dc.description.abstract

Determining public expectations of grief is an important contributor to the debate differentiating normal from pathological grief. An international sample of 348 participants was randomly allocated to 1 of 12 conditions comprising a bereavement vignette and self-report items measuring grief expectations and social distance. Participants expected grief to decrease steadily between 2 weeks and 6 months then stabilize; however, time did not affect social distance. Gender of the bereaved and circumstances of death did not influence expectations, but did interact to influence social distance. These factors must be accounted for in determining a deviation from the norm in diagnostic nosology.

dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.titlePublic Attitudes About Normal and Pathological Grief
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume38
dcterms.source.number8
dcterms.source.startPage510
dcterms.source.endPage516
dcterms.source.issn0748-1187
dcterms.source.titleDeath Studies
curtin.note

This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Death Studies, 2014, copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/">http://www.tandfonline.com/</a>. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2013.873839

curtin.departmentSchool of Psychology
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record