Short-Term Effects of Mulligan Mobilization With Movement on Pain, Disability, and Kinematic Spinal Movements in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
dc.contributor.author | Hidalgo, B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pitance, L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hall, Toby | |
dc.contributor.author | Detrembleur, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Nielens, H. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T13:21:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T13:21:20Z | |
dc.date.created | 2016-03-14T19:30:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hidalgo, B. and Pitance, L. and Hall, T. and Detrembleur, C. and Nielens, H. 2015. Short-Term Effects of Mulligan Mobilization With Movement on Pain, Disability, and Kinematic Spinal Movements in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 38 (6): pp. 365-374. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/30741 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.06.013 | |
dc.description.abstract |
Objective: The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the immediate- and short-term effects of lumbar Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) on patients with nonspecific low back pain with respect to 2 new kinematic algorithms (KA) for range of motion and speed as well as pain, functional disability, and kinesiophobia. Methods: This was a 2-armed randomized placebo-controlled trial. Subjects, blinded to allocation, were randomized to either a real-SNAG group (n = 16) or a sham-SNAG group (n = 16). All patients were treated during a single session of real/sham SNAG (3 × 6 repetitions) to the lumbar spine from a sitting position in a flexion direction. Two new KA from a validated kinematic spine model were used and recorded with an optoelectronic device. Pain at rest and during flexion as well as functional disability and kinesiophobia was recorded by self-reported measures. These outcomes were blindly evaluated before, after treatment, and at 2-week follow-up in both groups. Results: Of 6 variables, 4 demonstrated significant improvement with moderate-to-large effect sizes (ES) in favor of the real-SNAG group: KA-R (P = .014, between-groups ES Cliff δ = − .52), pain at rest and during flexion (visual analog scale, P < .001; ES = − .73/− .75), and functional-disability (Oswestry Disability Index, P = .003 and ES = − .61). Kinesiophobia was not considered to be significant (Tampa scale, P = .03) but presented moderate ES = − .46. Kinematic algorithms for speed was not significantly different between groups (P = .118) with a small ES = − .33. All 6 outcome measures were significantly different (P ≤ .008) during within-group analysis (before and after treatment) only in the real-SNAG group. No serious or moderate adverse events were reported. Conclusion: This study showed evidence that lumbar spine SNAGs had a short-term favorable effect on KA-R, pain, and function in patients with nonspecific low back pain. | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc | |
dc.title | Short-Term Effects of Mulligan Mobilization With Movement on Pain, Disability, and Kinematic Spinal Movements in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 38 | |
dcterms.source.number | 6 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 365 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 374 | |
dcterms.source.issn | 1532-6586 | |
dcterms.source.title | Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics | |
curtin.department | School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science | |
curtin.accessStatus | Open access |