Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) Using Rasch Analysis
MetadataShow full item record
Early and reliable screening for oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) symptoms in at-risk populations is important and a crucial first stage in effective OD management. The Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) is a commonly utilized screening and outcome measure. To date, studies using classic test theory methodologies report good psychometric properties, but the EAT-10 has not been evaluated using item response theory (e.g., Rasch analysis). The aim of this multisite study was to evaluate the internal consistency and structural validity and conduct a preliminary investigation of the cross-cultural validity of the EAT-10; floor and ceiling effects were also checked. Participants involved 636 patients deemed at risk of OD, from outpatient clinics in Spain, Turkey, Sweden, and Italy. The EAT-10 and videofluoroscopic and/or fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing were used to confirm OD diagnosis. Patients with esophageal dysphagia were excluded to ensure a homogenous sample. Rasch analysis was used to investigate person and item fit statistics, response scale, dimensionality of the scale, differential item functioning (DIF), and floor and ceiling effect. The results indicate that the EAT-10 has significant weaknesses in structural validity and internal consistency. There are both item redundancy and lack of easy and difficult items. The thresholds of the rating scale categories were disordered and gender, confirmed OD, and language, and comorbid diagnosis showed DIF on a number of items. DIF analysis of language showed preliminary evidence of problems with cross-cultural validation, and the measure showed a clear floor effect. The authors recommend redevelopment of the EAT-10 using Rasch analysis.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
What matters most to patients following percutaneous coronary interventions? A new patient-reported outcome measure developed using Rasch analysisSoh, S.E.; Barker, A.L.; Ayton, D.R.; Ahern, S.; Morello, R.; Lefkovits, J.; Brennan, A.L.; Evans, S.; Zalcberg, J.R.; Reid, Christopher ; McNeil, J.J. (2019)© 2019 Soh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original ...
Using Rasch Analysis to Evaluate the Reliability and Validity of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire: An Item Response Theory Approach.Cordier, Reinie; Speyer, R.; Schindler, A.; Michou, E.; Heijnen, B.; Baijens, L.; Karaduman, A.; Swan, K.; Clavé, P.; Joosten, A. (2018)The Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) is widely used clinically and in research to evaluate quality of life related to swallowing difficulties. It has been described as a valid and reliable tool, but was ...
Development and testing of the Measure of Innovation-Specific Implementation Intentions (MISII) using Rasch measurement theoryMoullin, Joanna; Ehrhart, M.; Aarons, G. (2018)© 2018 The Author(s). Background: Implementation is proposed to be a multiphase, multilevel process. After a period of exploration, an adoption decision is made, typically at the upper management or policy level. Nevertheless, ...