Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDahne, M.
dc.contributor.authorGilles, A.
dc.contributor.authorLucke, Klaus
dc.contributor.authorPeschko, V.
dc.contributor.authorAdler, S.
dc.contributor.authorKrugel, K.
dc.contributor.authorSundermeyer, J.
dc.contributor.authorSiebert, U.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:27:28Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:27:28Z
dc.date.created2014-10-08T01:14:47Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationDahne, M. and Gilles, A. and Lucke, K. and Peschko, V. and Adler, S. and Krugel, K. and Sundermeyer, J. et al. 2013. Effects of pile-driving on harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) at the first offshore wind farm in Germany. Environmental Research Letters. 8 (1): pp. 1-17.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/31808
dc.description.abstract

The first offshore wind farm ‘alpha ventus’ in the German North Sea was constructed north east of Borkum ReefGround approximately 45 km north off the German coast in 2008 and 2009 using percussive piling for the foundationsof 12 wind turbines. Visual monitoring of harbour porpoises was conducted prior to as well as during construction andoperation by means of 15 aerial line transect distance sampling surveys, from 2008 to 2010. Static acoustic monitoring(SAM) with echolocation click loggers at 12 positions was performed additionally from 2008 to 2011. SAM deviceswere deployed between 1 and 50 km from the centre of the wind farm. During aerial surveys, 18 600 km of transectlines were covered in two survey areas (10 934 and 11 824 km2) and 1392 harbour porpoise sightings were recorded.Lowest densities were documented during the construction period in 2009. The spatial distribution pattern recorded ontwo aerial surveys three weeks before and exactly during pile-driving points towards a strong avoidance response within20 km distance of the noise source. Generalized additive modelling of SAM data showed a negative impact ofpile-driving on relative porpoise detection rates at eight positions at distances less than 10.8 km. Increased detectionrates were found at two positions at 25 and 50 km distance suggesting that porpoises were displaced towards thesepositions. A pile-driving related behavioural reaction could thus be detected using SAM at a much larger distance than apure avoidance radius would suggest. The first waiting time (interval between porpoise detections of at least 10 min),after piling started, increased with longer piling durations. A gradient in avoidance, a gradual fading of the avoidancereaction with increasing distance from the piling site, is hence most probably a product of an incomplete displacementduring shorter piling events.

dc.publisherInstitute of Physics Publishing Ltd.
dc.relation.urihttp://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/025002/pdf/1748-9326_8_2_025002.pdf
dc.subjectaerial surveys
dc.subjectoffshore wind farm
dc.subjectC-PODs
dc.subjectbehavioural reactions
dc.subjectharbour porpoise
dc.subjectunderwater noise effects
dc.subjectpile-driving
dc.subjectNorth Sea
dc.subjectstatic - acoustic monitoring
dc.titleEffects of pile-driving on harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) at the first offshore wind farm in Germany
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume8
dcterms.source.number1
dcterms.source.startPage1
dcterms.source.endPage17
dcterms.source.issn1748-9326
dcterms.source.titleEnvironmental Research Letters
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record