Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDharani, R.
dc.contributor.authorLee, C.
dc.contributor.authorTheng, Z.
dc.contributor.authorDrury, Vicki
dc.contributor.authorNgo, C.
dc.contributor.authorSandar, M.
dc.contributor.authorWong, T.
dc.contributor.authorFinkelstein, E.
dc.contributor.authorSaw, S.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:28:22Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:28:22Z
dc.date.created2013-01-16T20:00:28Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationDharani, R. and Lee, C.-F. and Theng, Z.X. and Drury, V.B. and Ngo, C. and Sandar, M. and Wong, T.-Y. and Finkelstein, E.A. and Saw, S.-M. 2012. Comparison of measurements of time outdoors and light levels as risk factors for myopia in young Singapore children. Eye. 26 (7): pp. 911-918.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/31948
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/eye.2012.49
dc.description.abstract

Aims: To compare methods to measure time outdoor and light levels, two possible predictors of myopia, in Singapore children. Methods: Outdoor time from a diary and portable light meter over a 1-week period was compared in 117 Singapore children aged 6–12 years with and without myopia. All children wore a (HOBO Pendant temp/light Part # UA-002-64) light meter for 1 week and the parents filled the 7-day outdoor diary to track the outdoor activity. Results: Mean outdoor time from diary and time with light levels was 5.44 hours per week and 7.91 hours per week, respectively, during school term and school holidays. Time spent with light levels of >1000 Lux from the light meter were 7.08 h per week and 9.81 h per week, respectively, during school term and school holidays. The intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.21 and 0.28 for outdoor time from the diary and light meter (1000 Lux cut-off) during the school term and holidays, respectively. The correlation coefficient was 0.34 (95% CI 0.05, 0.58) for a weekday during school holidays, 0.17 (−0.14, 0.45) for a weekday during school term, 0.07 (−0.16, 0.29) for a weekday during school term, and 0.25 (0.02, 0.46) for a weekend during school term. Conclusions: The agreement between the light meter and 1-week diary was poor to fair. Both instruments measure different parameters, time outdoors and light intensity, and could therefore capture different aspects of risk in future myopia studies.

dc.publisherNature
dc.subjectlight intensity
dc.subjectlight meter
dc.subjectoutdoor diary
dc.subjectmyopia
dc.subjectoutdoor activity
dc.titleComparison of measurements of time outdoors and light levels as risk factors for myopia in young Singapore children
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume26
dcterms.source.number7
dcterms.source.startPage911
dcterms.source.endPage918
dcterms.source.issn0950222X
dcterms.source.titleEye
curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusOpen access via publisher


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record