Comparison of Remove-Compute-Restore and University of New Brunswick Techniques to Geoid Determination over Australia, and Inclusion of Wiener-Type Filters in Reference Field Contribution
dc.contributor.author | Featherstone, Will | |
dc.contributor.author | Holmes, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kirby, Jon | |
dc.contributor.author | Kuhn, Michael | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T13:30:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T13:30:31Z | |
dc.date.created | 2008-11-12T23:25:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Featherstone, W E and Holmes, S A and Kirby, J F and Kuhn, M. 2004. Comparison of Remove-Compute-Restore and University of New Brunswick Techniques to Geoid Determination over Australia, and Inclusion of Wiener-Type Filters in Reference Field Contribution. Journal of Surveying Engineering 130 (1): 40-47. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/32343 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2004)130:1(40) | |
dc.description.abstract |
The commonly adopted remove-compute-restore (RCR) technique for regional gravimetric geoid determination uses the maximum degree of a combined global geopotential model and regional gravity data via the spherical Stokes integral. The University of New Brunswick's (UNB) technique involves the use of a deterministically modified integration kernel, a degree-20 satellite-only reference field, integration of high-frequency terrestrial gravity anomalies over a spherical cap of 6 radius about each computation point, and a separate computation of the truncation bias used Degrees 21 120 of a combined global geopotential model. Both approaches are tested over Australia and the resulting geoid models compared with a nationwide dataset of 1,013 Global Positioning System (GPS)-leveled points, and with the most recent Australian geoid model, AUSGeoid98. A subsequent experiment considers the commission errors in the reference field used by applying a Wiener-type filter based on the global degree- and error-degree variances of the EGM96 combined and EGM96S satellite-only global geopotential models. The theoretical basis of this adapted approach will be presented, together with comparisons of the resulting geoid solution with the 1,013 GPS-leveling data, UNB, RCR, and AUSGeoid98 solutions. | |
dc.publisher | ASCE | |
dc.subject | Filters | |
dc.subject | Surveys | |
dc.subject | Geoid | |
dc.subject | Data analysis | |
dc.subject | Models | |
dc.title | Comparison of Remove-Compute-Restore and University of New Brunswick Techniques to Geoid Determination over Australia, and Inclusion of Wiener-Type Filters in Reference Field Contribution | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 130 | |
dcterms.source.number | 1 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 40 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 47 | |
dcterms.source.title | Journal of Surveying Engineering | |
curtin.department | Western Australian Centre for Geodesy | |
curtin.identifier | EPR-1142 | |
curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available | |
curtin.faculty | Division of Resources and Environment | |
curtin.faculty | Department of Spatial Sciences |