Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFeatherstone, Will
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, S.
dc.contributor.authorKirby, Jon
dc.contributor.authorKuhn, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:30:31Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:30:31Z
dc.date.created2008-11-12T23:25:28Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationFeatherstone, W E and Holmes, S A and Kirby, J F and Kuhn, M. 2004. Comparison of Remove-Compute-Restore and University of New Brunswick Techniques to Geoid Determination over Australia, and Inclusion of Wiener-Type Filters in Reference Field Contribution. Journal of Surveying Engineering 130 (1): 40-47.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/32343
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2004)130:1(40)
dc.description.abstract

The commonly adopted remove-compute-restore (RCR) technique for regional gravimetric geoid determination uses the maximum degree of a combined global geopotential model and regional gravity data via the spherical Stokes integral. The University of New Brunswick's (UNB) technique involves the use of a deterministically modified integration kernel, a degree-20 satellite-only reference field, integration of high-frequency terrestrial gravity anomalies over a spherical cap of 6 radius about each computation point, and a separate computation of the truncation bias used Degrees 21 120 of a combined global geopotential model. Both approaches are tested over Australia and the resulting geoid models compared with a nationwide dataset of 1,013 Global Positioning System (GPS)-leveled points, and with the most recent Australian geoid model, AUSGeoid98. A subsequent experiment considers the commission errors in the reference field used by applying a Wiener-type filter based on the global degree- and error-degree variances of the EGM96 combined and EGM96S satellite-only global geopotential models. The theoretical basis of this adapted approach will be presented, together with comparisons of the resulting geoid solution with the 1,013 GPS-leveling data, UNB, RCR, and AUSGeoid98 solutions.

dc.publisherASCE
dc.subjectFilters
dc.subjectSurveys
dc.subjectGeoid
dc.subjectData analysis
dc.subjectModels
dc.titleComparison of Remove-Compute-Restore and University of New Brunswick Techniques to Geoid Determination over Australia, and Inclusion of Wiener-Type Filters in Reference Field Contribution
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume130
dcterms.source.number1
dcterms.source.startPage40
dcterms.source.endPage47
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Surveying Engineering
curtin.departmentWestern Australian Centre for Geodesy
curtin.identifierEPR-1142
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available
curtin.facultyDivision of Resources and Environment
curtin.facultyDepartment of Spatial Sciences


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record