Curtin University Homepage
  • Library
  • Help
    • Admin

    espace - Curtin’s institutional repository

    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item

    What predicts punitiveness? An examination of predictors of punitive attitudes towards offenders in Australia

    Access Status
    Fulltext not available
    Authors
    Spiranovic, C.
    Roberts, Lynne
    Indermaur, D.
    Date
    2012
    Type
    Journal Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Spiranovic, C. and Roberts, L. and Indermaur, D. 2012. What predicts punitiveness? An examination of predictors of punitive attitudes towards offenders in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 19 (2): pp. 249-261.
    Source Title
    Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
    DOI
    10.1080/13218719.2011.561766
    ISSN
    1321-8719
    School
    School of Psychology and Speech Pathology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/32742
    Collection
    • Curtin Research Publications
    Abstract

    A widespread public preference for harsher sentencing (punitiveness) has been documented in a range of national and international studies. The present study examines the relative predictive power of a set of factors most commonly linked with punitiveness. This study is based on the responses given in the largest Australian survey to date of public attitudes to punishment (N = 6005). A combined hierarchical multiple regression model comprising demographic variables, media usage variables, and crime salience variables accounted for a significant 30% of variance in scores for punitiveness. The three variables that emerged as the strongest predictors of punitive attitudes were: perceptions of crime levels; education; and reliance on tabloid/commercial media for news and information. The results have direct implications for how we understand the persistent public preference for punishment and what might be required to ameliorate or respond to that preference.

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • A country not divided: A comparison of public punitiveness and confidence in sentencing across Australia
      Roberts, Lynne; Spiranovic, C.; Indermaur, D. (2011)
      Changes to sentencing legislation are often introduced or justified on the basis of satisfying public opinion. If sentencing policy is a reflection of public opinion we should see a concordance between different sentencing ...
    • Assessing contemporary parenting dimensions : development and psychometric investigation of the parenting behaviours and dimensions questionnaire
      Reid, Carly Ae Yeong (2012)
      While a substantial amount of research has been conducted on parenting and its effects on child development, there is a significant lack of agreement over the key dimensions of parenting and the assessment of parenting ...
    • A matter of judgement: The effect of information and deliberation on public attitudes to punishment
      Indermaur, D.; Roberts, Lynne; Spiranovic, C.; Mackenzie, G.; Gelb, K. (2012)
      The idea of reducing public punitiveness through providing information and encouraging deliberation has attracted considerable interest. However, there remains no solid evidence of durable changes in attitude. The study ...
    Advanced search

    Browse

    Communities & CollectionsIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument TypeThis CollectionIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument Type

    My Account

    Admin

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Follow Curtin

    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 

    CRICOS Provider Code: 00301JABN: 99 143 842 569TEQSA: PRV12158

    Copyright | Disclaimer | Privacy statement | Accessibility

    Curtin would like to pay respect to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander members of our community by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land on which the Perth campus is located, the Whadjuk people of the Nyungar Nation; and on our Kalgoorlie campus, the Wongutha people of the North-Eastern Goldfields.