Training in mitral valve surgery need not affect early outcomes and midterm survival: A multicentre analysis
MetadataShow full item record
Objective: Mitral valve surgery may be regarded as less favourable for training, due to greater mortality risk, technical complexity, and difficulty for the supervisor to observe. We examined this perception by reviewing a multicentre experience. Methods: We analysed a multicentre database over a 7-year period containing 2216 isolated and combined mitral procedures. Of these, 2048 were performed by consultants and 168 by trainees (92% vs 8%) of varying seniority. Preoperative characteristics, early postoperative outcomes and 6-year survival were compared between groups. Propensity-score matching was performed to correct for group differences. Results: Trainees were less likely to operate on patients, who had previously undergone coronary surgery (consultant 4.3% vs trainee 1.2%, p=0.043) and those with moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (86% vs 81%, p=0.012). There were no other statistically significant differences in preoperative variables, such as urgency, endocarditis and left-ventricular dysfunction. There were similar rates of mitral valve repair (48% vs 51%, p=0.48). Trainees were more likely to operate on rheumatic valve pathology (20% vs 28%, p=0.012). Intra-operatively, trainees had longer aortic cross-clamp times (119 ± 52 vs 136 ± 50. min, p=0.0001). At 30 days, mortality was comparable (4.5% vs 3.6%, p=0.56) with a trend towards higher any mortality/morbidity in consultant procedures (33% vs 26%, p=0.059). At 6 years, survival was similar (79 ± 1.4% vs 78 ± 4.0%, p=0.73). After derivation of 142 propensity-score-matched patient pairs, trainees cases still experienced longer cross-clamp times (121 ± 58 vs 137 ± 52. min, p=0.023), but there was similar 30-day mortality (4.2% vs 3.5%, p>0.99) and any mortality/morbidity (28% vs 24%, p=0.52). Six-year survival between matched pairs was also similar (74 ± 7.2% vs 80 ± 4.4%, p=0.64). Trainee status did not predict early or late adverse events after multivariate Cox regression with and without propensity-score adjustment. Conclusions: Trainee outcomes are not inferior even when corrected for risk. This suggests that excellent operative training and supervision can be achieved in mitral valve surgery. © 2011 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Russell, E.; Walsh, W.; Reid, Christopher; Tran, L.; Brown, A.; Bennetts, J.; Baker, R.; Tam, R.; Maguire, G. (2017)Objective: To further the understanding of the factors influencing outcome following rheumatic heart disease (RHD) related mitral valve surgery, which globally remains an important cause of heart disease and a particular ...
Impact of prosthesis - Patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement: A multicentre analysis of early outcomes and mid-term survivalShi, W.; Yap, C.; Hayward, P.; Dinh, D.; Reid, Christopher; Shardey, G.; Smith, J. (2011)Background: Prosthesis - patient mismatch (PPM) is characterised by the effects of inadequate prosthesis size relative to body surface area (BSA). It is uncertain whether PPM after mitral valve replacement impacts upon ...
Training surgeon status is not associated with an increased risk of early or late mortality after isolated aortic valve replacement surgerySaxena, A.; Dinh, D.; Smith, J.; Reid, Christopher; Shardey, G.; Newcomb, A. (2014)Background: Few studies have addressed the effect of "trainee surgeon" status on outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods and Results: A retrospective analysis of data, collected by the Australasian ...