Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLee, Crystal
dc.contributor.authorHuxley, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorWildman, R.
dc.contributor.authorWoodward, M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:36:17Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:36:17Z
dc.date.created2016-09-12T08:36:30Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationLee, C. and Huxley, R. and Wildman, R. and Woodward, M. 2008. Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 61 (7): pp. 646-653.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/33307
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.08.012
dc.description.abstract

Objective: To determine which simple index of overweight and obesity is the best discriminator of cardiovascular risk factors. Study Design and Setting: This is a meta-analysis of published literature. MEDLINE was searched. Studies that used receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis and published area under the ROC curves (AUC) for overweight and obesity indices with hypertension, type-2 diabetes, and/or dyslipidemia were included. The AUC for each of the four indices, with each risk factor, was pooled using a random-effects model; male and female data were analyzed separately. Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Body mass index (BMI) was the poorest discriminator for cardiovascular risk factors. Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) was the best discriminator for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia in both sexes; its pooled AUC (95% confidence intervals) ranged from 0.67 (0.64, 0.69) to 0.73 (0.70, 0.75) and from 0.68 (0.63, 0.72) to 0.76 (0.70, 0.81) in males and females, respectively. Conclusion: Statistical evidence supports the superiority of measures of centralized obesity, especially WHtR, over BMI, for detecting cardiovascular risk factors in both men and women. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

dc.publisherElsevier
dc.titleIndices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume61
dcterms.source.number7
dcterms.source.startPage646
dcterms.source.endPage653
dcterms.source.issn0895-4356
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
curtin.departmentSchool of Public Health
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record