Curtin University Homepage
  • Library
  • Help
    • Admin

    espace - Curtin’s institutional repository

    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item

    Literature review: Considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups

    Access Status
    Fulltext not available
    Authors
    Halcomb, E.
    Gholizedah, L.
    DiGiacomo, Michelle
    Phillips, J.
    Davidson, Patricia
    Date
    2007
    Type
    Journal Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Halcomb, E. and Gholizedah, L. and DiGiacomo, M. and Phillips, J. and Davidson, P. 2007. Literature review: Considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 16 (6): pp. 1000-1011.
    Source Title
    Journal of Clinical Nursing
    DOI
    10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x
    Additional URLs
    http://www.blackwellpublishing.com
    ISSN
    1365-2702
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/33378
    Collection
    • Curtin Research Publications
    Abstract

    Aims: This integrated literature review seeks to identify the key considerations in conducting focus groups and discusses the specific considerations for research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups. Background: The focus group method is a technique of group interview that generates data through the opinions expressed by participants. Focus groups have become an increasingly popular method of data collection in health care research. Although focus groups have been used extensively with Western populations, they are a particularly useful tool for engaging culturally and linguistically diverse populations. The success of focus groups in this context is dependent upon the cultural competence of the research team and the research questions. Methods: The electronic databases Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Psychlit and the Internet using the Google Scholar search engine were explored using the search terms ‘focus group’, ‘cultural sensitivity’, ‘transcultural nursing’, ‘transcultural care’, ‘cultural diversity’ and ‘ethnic groups’. Hand searching of reference lists and relevant journals was also undertaken. English language articles were selected for the review if they discussed the following issues: (1) methodological implications of the focus group method; (2) strengths and limitations of the focus group method; (3) recommendations for researchers and (4) use of the focus group in culturally and linguistically diverse groups. Conclusions were drawn from each of the articles and consensus regarding a summary of recommendations was derived from a minimum of two authors. Results: Findings from this review revealed several key issues involving focus group implementation including recruitment, sample size, data collection, data analysis and use within multicultural populations. Strengths and limitations of the focus group method were also identified. Conclusions: Focus groups are a useful tool to expand existing knowledge about service provision and identify consumer needs that will assist in the development of future intervention programs, particularly within multicultural populations. Careful planning related to methodological and pragmatic issues are critical in deriving effective data and protecting participants. Relevance to clinical practice: Focus groups can facilitate increased understanding of perspectives of culturally and linguistically diverse groups and thereby shape clinical practice to better meet the needs of these groups.

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Does cultural and linguistic diversity affect health-related outcomes for people with stroke at discharge from hospital?
      Davies, S.; Dodd, K.; Hill, Keith (2017)
      Purpose: Primary purpose to determine if cultural and linguistic diversity affects health-related outcomes in people with stroke at discharge from hospital and secondary purpose to explore whether interpreter use alters ...
    • A review of the cultural competence view of cardiac rehabilitation
      Davidson, Patricia; Gholizadeh, L.; Haghshenas, A.; Rotem, A.; Digiacomo, Michelle; Eisenbruch, M.; Salamonson, Y. (2010)
      Aims and objectives. This paper describes cultural competence issues within the scientific and scholarly discourse surrounding cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Background.CR is an important secondary prevention strategy, ...
    • Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: does it work for Indigenous Australians?
      Christou, Aliki; Katzenellenbogen, Judith; Thompson, Sandra (2010)
      Background. Despite a lower incidence of bowel cancer overall, Indigenous Australians are more likely to be diagnosed at an advanced stage when prognosis is poor. Bowel cancer screening is an effective means of reducing ...
    Advanced search

    Browse

    Communities & CollectionsIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument TypeThis CollectionIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument Type

    My Account

    Admin

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Follow Curtin

    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 

    CRICOS Provider Code: 00301JABN: 99 143 842 569TEQSA: PRV12158

    Copyright | Disclaimer | Privacy statement | Accessibility

    Curtin would like to pay respect to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander members of our community by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land on which the Perth campus is located, the Whadjuk people of the Nyungar Nation; and on our Kalgoorlie campus, the Wongutha people of the North-Eastern Goldfields.