Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLi, Ian
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:38:02Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:38:02Z
dc.date.created2015-03-03T20:13:52Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationLi, I. and Miller, P. 2012. Gender Discrimination in the Australian Graduate Labour Market. Australian Journal of Labour Economics. 15 (3): pp. 167-199.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/33589
dc.description.abstract

This paper examines gender discrimination in the Australian graduate labour market, using data from the Graduate Destination Surveys 1999-2009. A framework of analysis provided by the overeducation/required education/undereducation literature is applied. A smaller gender wage gap is found for university graduates than that reported for all workers in earlier studies. It is shown, however, that the gender wage gap widens with the age at graduation. This pattern is argued to reflect the influence of the mismeasurement of actual labour market experience in the conventional education and experience earnings equation on the standardised gender pay gap. Female graduates are less likely to be overeducated, compared to male graduates. Overeducation, while associated with substantial penalties, is not a substantial contributor to the gender wage gap.

dc.publisherThe Centre for Labour Market Research, Curtin Business School, Curtin University of Technology
dc.relation.urihttp://ftp.iza.org/dp6595.pdf
dc.titleGender Discrimination in the Australian Graduate Labour Market
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume15
dcterms.source.number3
dcterms.source.startPage167
dcterms.source.endPage199
dcterms.source.issn13281143
dcterms.source.titleAustralian Journal of Labour Economics
curtin.departmentSchool of Economics and Finance
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record