Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLipp, Ottmar
dc.contributor.authorTerry, D.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, J.
dc.contributor.authorTellegen, C.
dc.contributor.authorKuebbeler, J.
dc.contributor.authorNewey, M.
dc.identifier.citationLipp, O. and Terry, D. and Smith, J. and Tellegen, C. and Kuebbeler, J. and Newey, M. 2009. Searching for Differences in Race: Is There Evidence for Preferential Detection of Other-Race Faces?. Emotion. 9 (3): pp. 350-360.

Previous research has suggested that like animal and social fear-relevant stimuli, other-race faces (African American) are detected preferentially in visual search. Three experiments using Chinese or Indonesian faces as other-race faces yielded the opposite pattern of results: faster detection of same-race faces among other-race faces. This apparently inconsistent pattern of results was resolved by showing that Asian and African American faces are detected preferentially in tasks that have small stimulus sets and employ fixed target searches. Asian and African American other-race faces are found slower among Caucasian face backgrounds if larger stimulus sets are used in tasks with a variable mapping of stimulus to background or target. Thus, preferential detection of other-race faces was not found under task conditions in which preferential detection of animal and social fear-relevant stimuli is evident. Although consistent with the view that same-race faces are processed in more detail than other-race faces, the current findings suggest that other-race faces do not draw attention preferentially. © 2009 American Psychological Association.

dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association
dc.titleSearching for Differences in Race: Is There Evidence for Preferential Detection of Other-Race Faces?
dc.typeJournal Article
curtin.departmentSchool of Psychology and Speech Pathology
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record