3D or 3-D: a study of terminology, usage and style
| dc.contributor.author | Woods, Andrew J. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T13:44:56Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T13:44:56Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2014-03-19T20:00:43Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Woods, Andrew. 2013. 3D or 3-D: a study of terminology, usage and style. European Science Editing. 39 (3): pp. 59-62. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34664 | |
| dc.description.abstract |
The terms “3D” and “3-D” are two alternative acronyms for the term “three-dimensional”. In the published literature both variants are commonly used but what is the derivation of the two forms and what are the drivers of usage? This paper surveys the published stereoscopic literature and examines publication-style policies to understand forces and trends. | |
| dc.publisher | The European Association of Science Editors (EASE) | |
| dc.relation.uri | http://www.ease.org.uk/sites/default/files/3darticle.pdf | |
| dc.subject | style | |
| dc.subject | terminology | |
| dc.subject | three-dimensional | |
| dc.subject | Stereoscopic | |
| dc.subject | 3D | |
| dc.subject | 3-D | |
| dc.title | 3D or 3-D: a study of terminology, usage and style | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dcterms.source.volume | 39 | |
| dcterms.source.number | 3 | |
| dcterms.source.startPage | 59 | |
| dcterms.source.endPage | 62 | |
| dcterms.source.issn | 0950-1835 | |
| dcterms.source.title | Journal: European Science Editing | |
| curtin.department | ||
| curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |