Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBloch, Harry
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:47:05Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:47:05Z
dc.date.created2011-01-31T20:02:49Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationBloch, Harry. 2010. Research evaluation down under: An outsider's view from the inside of the Australian approach. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 69 (5): pp. 1530-1552.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/35016
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1536-7150.2010.00755.x
dc.description.abstract

Australia is currently undertaking its first national evaluation of university research, which is being performed by the Australian Research Council (ARC) at the request of the Australian government. The Australian approach to evaluation has some unique characteristics, especially a focus on evaluating research quantity and quality by the field of the research activity rather than by individual academic or administrative unit. This raises issues of the classification of areas of research, which has already caused controversy for Australian heterodox economists. There is also controversy about the quality rankings of economics journals. This paper provides a critical review of the Australian approach to research evaluation and discusses the implications for heterodox economists.

dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
dc.titleResearch evaluation down under: An outsider's view from the inside of the Australian approach
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume69
dcterms.source.startPage1530
dcterms.source.endPage1552
dcterms.source.issn0002-9246
dcterms.source.titleThe American Journal of Economics and Sociology
curtin.departmentSchool of Economics and Finance
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record