Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMurcia, C.
dc.contributor.authorAronson, J.
dc.contributor.authorKattan, G.
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Mateos, D.
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Kingsley
dc.contributor.authorSimberloff, D.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:47:59Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:47:59Z
dc.date.created2015-06-12T02:04:48Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationMurcia, C. and Aronson, J. and Kattan, G. and Moreno-Mateos, D. and Dixon, K. and Simberloff, D. 2014. A critique of the 'novel ecosystem' concept. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 29 (10): pp. 548-553.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/35145
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tree.2014.07.006
dc.description.abstract

The 'novel ecosystem' concept has captured the attention of scientists, managers, and science journalists, and more recently of policymakers, before it has been subjected to the scrutiny and empirical validation inherent to science. Lack of rigorous scrutiny can lead to undesirable outcomes in ecosystem management, environmental law, and policy. Contrary to the contentions of its proponents, no explicit, irreversible ecological thresholds allow distinctions between 'novel ecosystems' and 'hybrid' or 'historic' ones. Further, there is no clear message as to what practitioners should do with a 'novel ecosystem'. In addition, ecosystems of many types are being conserved, or restored to trajectories within historical ranges of variation, despite severe degradation that could have led to their being pronounced 'novel'

dc.publisherElsevier
dc.titleA critique of the 'novel ecosystem' concept
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume29
dcterms.source.number10
dcterms.source.startPage548
dcterms.source.endPage553
dcterms.source.issn0169-5347
dcterms.source.titleTrends in Ecology and Evolution
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record