Validity of an automated algorithm to identify waking and in-bed wear time in hip-worn accelerometer data collected with a 24 h wear protocol in young adults
dc.contributor.author | McVeigh, Joanne | |
dc.contributor.author | Winkler, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Healy, Genevieve | |
dc.contributor.author | Slater, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Eastwood, Peter | |
dc.contributor.author | Straker, Leon | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T13:50:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T13:50:56Z | |
dc.date.created | 2016-10-23T19:30:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | McVeigh, J. and Winkler, E. and Healy, G. and Slater, J. and Eastwood, P. and Straker, L. 2016. Validity of an automated algorithm to identify waking and in-bed wear time in hip-worn accelerometer data collected with a 24 h wear protocol in young adults. Physiological Measurement. 37 (10): pp. 1636-1652. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/35642 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1088/0967-3334/37/10/1636 | |
dc.description.abstract |
Researchers are increasingly using 24 h accelerometer wear protocols. No automated method has been published that accurately distinguishes 'waking' wear time from other data ('in-bed', non-wear, invalid days) in young adults. This study examined the validity of an automated algorithm developed to achieve this for hip-worn Actigraph GT3X + 60 s epoch data. We compared the algorithm against a referent method ('into-bed' and 'out-of-bed' times visually identified by two independent raters) and benchmarked against two published algorithms. All methods used the same non-wear rules. The development sample (n = 11) and validation sample (n = 95) were Australian young adults from the Raine pregnancy cohort (54% female), all aged approximately 22 years. The agreement with Rater 1 in each minute's classification (yes/no) of waking wear time was examined as kappa (κ), limited to valid days (10 h waking wear time per day) according to the algorithm and Rater 1. Bland-Altman methods assessed agreement in daily totals of waking wear and in-bed wear time. Excellent agreement (κ > 0.75) was obtained between the raters for 80% of participants (median κ = 0.94). The algorithm showed excellent agreement with Rater 1 (κ >.75) for 89% of participants and poor agreement (κ < 0.40) for 1%. In this sample, the algorithm (median κ = 0.86) performed better than algorithms validated in children (median κ = 0.77) and adolescents (median κ = 0.66). The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between Rater 1 and the algorithm was 7 (−220, 234) min d−1 for waking wear time on valid days and −41 (−309, 228) min d−1 for in-bed wear time.In this population, the automated algorithm's validity for identifying waking wear time was mostly good, not worse than inter-rater agreement, and better than the evaluated published alternatives. However, the algorithm requires improvement to better identify in-bed wear time. | |
dc.publisher | Institute of Physics Publishing Ltd | |
dc.title | Validity of an automated algorithm to identify waking and in-bed wear time in hip-worn accelerometer data collected with a 24 h wear protocol in young adults | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 37 | |
dcterms.source.number | 10 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 1636 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 1652 | |
dcterms.source.issn | 0967-3334 | |
dcterms.source.title | Physiological Measurement | |
curtin.department | School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science | |
curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |