Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCoulson, T.
dc.contributor.authorBailey, M.
dc.contributor.authorReid, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorTran, L.
dc.contributor.authorMullany, D.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, J.
dc.contributor.authorPilcher, D.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:53:06Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:53:06Z
dc.date.created2015-10-29T04:09:47Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationCoulson, T. and Bailey, M. and Reid, C. and Tran, L. and Mullany, D. and Smith, J. and Pilcher, D. 2014. Acute Risk Change for Cardiothoracic Admissions to Intensive Care (ARCTIC index): A new measure of quality in cardiac surgery. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 148 (6): pp. 3076-3081.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/36023
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.069
dc.description.abstract

Background: Quality of cardiac surgical care may vary between institutions. Mortality is low and large numbers are required to discriminate between hospitals. Measures other than mortality may provide better comparisons. Objectives: To develop and assess the Acute Risk Change for Cardiothoracic Admissions to Intensive Care (ARCTIC) index, a new performance measure for cardiothoracic admissions to intensive care units (ICUs). Methods: The Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons database and Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database were linked. Logistic regression was used to generate a predicted risk of death first from preoperative data using the previously validated Allprocscore and second on admission to an ICU using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score. Change in risk as a percentage (ARCTIC) was calculated for each patient. The validity of ARCTIC as a marker of quality was assessed by comparison with intraoperative variables and postoperative morbidity markers. Results: Sixteen thousand six hundred eighty-seven patients at 21 hospitals from 2008 to 2011 were matched. An increase in ARCTIC score was associated with prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (P = .001), intraoperative blood product transfusion (P < .001), reoperation (P < .0001), postoperative renal failure (P < .0001), prolonged ventilation (P < .0001), and stroke (P = .001). Conclusions: The ARCTIC index is associated with known markers of perioperative performance and postoperative morbidity. It may be used as an overall marker of quality for cardiac surgery. Further work is required to assess ARCTIC as a method to discriminate between cardiac surgical units.

dc.publisherMosby Inc.
dc.titleAcute Risk Change for Cardiothoracic Admissions to Intensive Care (ARCTIC index): A new measure of quality in cardiac surgery
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume148
dcterms.source.number6
dcterms.source.startPage3076
dcterms.source.endPage3081
dcterms.source.issn0022-5223
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
curtin.departmentDepartment of Health Policy and Management
curtin.accessStatusOpen access via publisher


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record