Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorLeslie, Gavin
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:55:56Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:55:56Z
dc.date.created2011-01-06T20:02:44Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationWilliams, Teresa A. and Leslie, Gavin D. 2010. Should gastric aspirate be discarded or retained when gastric residual volume is removed from gastric tubes? Australian Critical Care. 23 (4): pp. 215-217.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/36468
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aucc.2010.05.001
dc.description.abstract

Summary: Nursing care of patients with enteral feeding tubes is common in the intensive care unit but the evidence that surrounds the practice is limited. Recent research by Juve-Udina and colleagues (2010) "To return or to discard? Randomised trial on gastric residual volume management" compares two methods of managing gastric residual volume. This critique provides a brief summary of their research and critically appraises the paper. The implications for nursing practice are discussed.

dc.publisherElsevier Inc
dc.subjectenteral feeding
dc.subjectrandomised control trial
dc.subjectintensive care
dc.titleShould gastric aspirate be discarded or retained when gastric residual volume is removed from gastric tubes?
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume23
dcterms.source.startPage215
dcterms.source.endPage217
dcterms.source.issn1036-7314
dcterms.source.titleAustralian Critical Care
curtin.note

The link to the journal’s home page is: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/710660/description#description. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

curtin.departmentSchool of Nursing and Midwifery
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record