National park userpays systems in Australia. Cost recovery vs access for all?
MetadataShow full item record
This paper discusses the tension between user pays systems as a means of cost recovery and equity of public access using the example of Australian national parks. Six Australian state based national park management agencies were interviewed about their user pays systems. Australian national parks are managed as a public good, for biodiversity conservation, and to provide for recreation and tourism opportunities. Legislated social equity requirements result in discounted user pays systems that are generally not cost effective. This raises the question of whether user pays systems for cost recovery are compatible with access management based on social equity.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Parks, people and planning: local perceptions of park management on the Ningaloo Coast, North West Cape, Western AustraliaIngram, Colin Barry (2008)Attaining the ‘appropriate’ balance between human use of national parks and their protection is a topic of considerable public, scientific and business interest and is thus an important focus for research. An increasingly ...
Wang, Z.; King, E.; Smith, G.; Bellgard, M.; Broomhall, M.; Chedzey, H.; Fearns, P.; Garcia, R.; Hunter, A.; Lynch, Mervyn; Shibeci, D. (2011)Earth observation from space involves accessing, sharing, and processing huge volumes of data collected from satellite sensors. It is crucial for users to easily analyze and process the datasets, which may require complex ...
Lin, Ting; Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia); Robinson, Todd; Olaru, D.; Smith, B.; Taplin, J.; Cao, B. (2016)A train station catchment area delineates the spatial territory from which the users of a train station are drawn. The size and shape of this catchment can be influenced by a variety of factors, such as the transport ...