Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWalsh, W.
dc.contributor.authorHill, Keith
dc.contributor.authorBennell, K.
dc.contributor.authorVu, M.
dc.contributor.authorHaines, T.
dc.identifier.citationWalsh, Willeke and Hill, Keith D. and Bennell, Kim and Vu, Michelle and Haines, Terry P. 2011. Local adaptation and evaluation of a falls risk prevention approach in acute hospitals. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 23 (2): pp. 134-141.

Objective: To determine whether locally adapting a falls risk factor assessment tool results in an instrument with clinimetric properties sufficient to support an acute hospital's falls prevention program. Design: Prospective cohort study of predictive validity and observational investigation of intra- and inter-rater reliability. Setting Acute wards in two large hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Participants: One hundred and thirty acute hospital inpatients participated in the predictive accuracy evaluation, with 25 and 35 inpatients used for the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability analyses, respectively. Intervention(s): To develop a falls risk screen and assessment instrument through local adaptation of an existing tool. Clinimetric property analysis of new instrument (Western Health Falls Risk Assessment, WHeFRA) and comparison with ‘gold standard tool’ (STRATIFY). Main Outcome Measures: Fallers, falls and falls per 1000 bed days. Sensitivity (Sens), specificity (Spec), Youden Index (YI) and these three statistics based on event rate of falls (SensER, SpecER and YIER), were calculated to determine predictive accuracy. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), weighted kappa and signed rank test. Results: Seven participants (5.4%) fell, with 14 falls (fall rate: 10.7 falls per 1000 patient bed days). The WHeFRA instrument was significantly more accurate at predicting fallers and the rate of falls than the STRATIFY. Intra-rater reliability ICC (95% confidence intervals) for WHeFRA screen was 0.94 (0.86–0.97) and inter-rater reliability was 0.78 (0.61–0.88). Conclusions: Local adaptation of an existing tool resulted in an instrument with favorable clinimetric properties and may be a viable procedure for facilitating falls prevention program development and implementation in acute hospital settings.

dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.titleLocal adaptation and evaluation of a falls risk prevention approach in acute hospitals
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.titleInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
curtin.departmentSchool of Physiotherapy
curtin.accessStatusOpen access via publisher

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record