Improving the Evidence Base in Palliative Care to Inform Practice and Policy: Thinking Outside the Box
MetadataShow full item record
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 48 (2014). DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.01.007
The adoption of evidence-based hierarchies and research methods from other disciplines may not completely translate to complex palliative care settings. The heterogeneity of the palliative care population, complexity of clinical presentations, and fluctuating health states present significant research challenges. The aim of this narrative review was to explore the debate about the use of current evidence-based approaches for conducting research, such as randomized controlled trials and other study designs, in palliative care, and more specifically to 1) describe key myths about palliative care research; 2) highlight substantive challenges of conducting palliative care research, using case illustrations; and 3) propose specific strategies to address some of these challenges. Myths about research in palliative care revolve around evidence hierarchies, sample heterogeneity, random assignment, participant burden, and measurement issues. Challenges arise because of the complex physical, psychological, existential, and spiritual problems faced by patients, families, and service providers. These challenges can be organized according to six general domains: patient, system/organization, context/setting, study design, research team, and ethics. A number of approaches for dealing with challenges in conducting research fall into five separate domains: study design, sampling, conceptual, statistical, and measures and outcomes. Although randomized controlled trials have their place whenever possible, alternative designs may offer more feasible research protocols that can be successfully implemented in palliative care. Therefore, this article highlights “outside the box” approaches that would benefit both clinicians and researchers in the palliative care field. Ultimately, the selection of research designs is dependent on a clearly articulated research question, which drives the research process.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
A systematic review on the factors affecting effective communication between registered nurses and oncology adult patients in the inpatient settingTay, L.; Hegney, Desley; Ang, E. (2010)Background: Effective nurse-patient communication is essential in the development of therapeutic relationships and meeting the cognitive and affective needs of oncology patients. However, the emotional load in cancer ...
Palliative care for people with schizophrenia: A qualitative study of an under-serviced group in needMcNamara, Beverley; Same, A.; Rosenwax, L.; Kelly, B. (2018)Â© 2018 The Author(s). Background: People with schizophrenia are at risk of receiving poorer end of life care than other patients. They are often undertreated, avoid treatment and are about half as likely to access ...
Desire for hastened death in patients with adanced disease and the evidence base of clinical guidelines: a systematic reviewHudson, P.; Kristjanson, Linda; Ashby, M.; Kelly, B.; Schofield, P.; Hudson, R.; Aranda, S.; O'Connor, M.; Street, A. (2006)Desire for hastened death in patients with advanced disease and the evidence base of clinical guidelines: a systematic review.Patients' desire for hastened death within the context of advanced disease and palliative care ...