Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStephens, S.
dc.contributor.authorWinkler, E.
dc.contributor.authorTrost, S.
dc.contributor.authorDunstan, D.
dc.contributor.authorEakin, E.
dc.contributor.authorChastin, S.
dc.contributor.authorHealy, Genevieve
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T14:06:32Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T14:06:32Z
dc.date.created2015-03-10T20:00:33Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.submitted2015-03-11
dc.identifier.citationStephens, S. and Winkler, E. and Trost, S. and Dunstan, D. and Eakin, E. and Chastin, S. and Healy, G. 2014. Intervening to reduce workplace sitting time: how and when do changes to sitting time occur?. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 48 (13): pp. 1037-1042.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/37696
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bjsports-2014-093524
dc.description.abstract

Objective: To investigate how and when changes in workplace sitting time occurred following a workplace intervention to inform evaluation of intervention success. Method: The 4-week Stand Up Comcare study (June–September 2011) aimed to reduce workplace sitting time via regularly interrupting and replacing sitting time throughout the day. Activity monitor (activPAL3) workplace data from control (n=22) and intervention participants (n=21) were analysed. Differences in the number and usual duration of sitting bouts were used to evaluate how change occurred. To examine when change occurred, intervention effects were compared by hour since starting work and hour of the workday. Change in workplace activity (sitting, standing, stepping) was examined to further inform alignment with intervention messages. Individual variability was examined in how and when the change occurred. Results: Overall, behavioural changes aligned with intervention aims. All intervention participants reduced total workplace sitting time, though there was wide individual variability observed (range −29 to −262 min per 8 h workday). On average, intervention participants reduced number of sitting bouts (−4.6 bouts (95% CI −10.1 to 1.0), p=0.106) and usual sitting bout duration (−5.6 min (95% CI −9.8 to −1.4, p=0.011)) relative to controls. Sitting time reductions were observed across the workday, though intervention effects varied by hour of the day (p=0.015). The intervention group successfully adopted the Stand Up and Sit Less intervention messages across the day. Conclusion: These analyses confirmed that this workplace intervention successfully modified sitting behaviour as intended (ie, fewer and shorter sitting bouts, with changes occurring throughout the day).

dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.titleIntervening to reduce workplace sitting time: how and when do changes to sitting time occur?
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateSubmitted2015-03-11
dcterms.source.volume48
dcterms.source.number13
dcterms.source.startPage1037
dcterms.source.endPage1042
dcterms.source.issn0306-3674
dcterms.source.titleBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
curtin.digitool.pid219292
curtin.pubStatusPublished
curtin.refereedTRUE
curtin.departmentSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science
curtin.identifier.scriptidPUB-HEA-SOP-KA-85785
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record