Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTaneja, R.
dc.contributor.authorO'Neill, C.
dc.contributor.authorLackie, M.
dc.contributor.authorRushmer, T.
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, P.
dc.contributor.authorJourdan, Fred
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T14:07:24Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T14:07:24Z
dc.date.created2015-01-29T20:00:50Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationTaneja, R. and O'Neill, C. and Lackie, M. and Rushmer, T. and Schmidt, P. and Jourdan, F. 2014. 40Ar/39Ar geochronology and the paleoposition of Christmas Island (Australia), Northeast Indian Ocean. Gondwana Research. 28 (1): pp. 391-406.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/37754
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gr.2014.04.004
dc.description.abstract

The Christmas Island Seamount Province is an extensive zone of volcanism in the Northeast Indian Ocean, consisting of numerous submerged seamounts and flat-topped guyots. Within this region lies two subaerial island groups, Christmas Island, and the Cocos Keeling archipelago. Christmas Island has experienced multiple episodes of volcanism that are exposed sporadically along its coastline. Here, we dated these volcanics using 40Ar/39Ar geochronology and analysed them for paleomagnetism. The oldest exposed volcanism occurred in the Eocene between 43 and 37 Ma. This is followed by a time gap of ~33 million years, before the eruption of a younger episode of Pliocene age (4.32 ± 0.17 Ma). It has, however, been suggested by previous workers that there is a much older Late Cretaceous event beneath the limestone which is unexposed. In addition, this study conducted the first paleomagnetic analysis of samples from Christmas Island to determine its paleoposition and the paleomagnetic polarity of the sampled sites. Two normal and two reversal magnetic events have beenrecorded, that agree with the geomagnetic reversal timescales. Late Eocene (38–39 Ma) palaeomagnetic data suggest a palaeolatitude of - 43.5°-11.2°+9.0° , which is further south than palaeolatitudes (around 30° S) derived from existing plate reconstruction models for the Australian plate. However, the Late Eocene palaeomagnetic data are limited (only two sites) and secular variation may not have been averaged out. During the Pliocene (ca. 4Ma)we estimate a palaeolatitude of approximately 13° S. The presence of the Late Eocene ages at Christmas Island correlates wellwith the cessation of spreading of the Wharton Ridge (~43Ma), the initiation of spreading along the South East Indian Ridge, and the transit of Christmas Island over a broad lowvelocity zone in the upper mantle. This suggests that changes in stress regimes following the tectonic reorganisation of the region(prior to~43Ma) may have allowed deeper-originmantlemelts to rise. Similarly, changes in the plate's stress regime at the flexural bulge of the Sunda–Java subduction zone may be implicated in renewed melting at ~4 Ma, suggesting that tectonic stresses have exerted a first-order effect on the timing and emplacement of volcanism at Christmas Island.

dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subjectIndian Ocean
dc.subjectPaleomagnetism
dc.subjectCapricorn plate
dc.subjectPlate reconstruction
dc.subjectSeismic tomography
dc.subjectSeamounts
dc.title40Ar/39Ar geochronology and the paleoposition of Christmas Island (Australia), Northeast Indian Ocean
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.startPage1
dcterms.source.endPage16
dcterms.source.issn1342-937X
dcterms.source.titleGondwana Research
curtin.departmentDepartment of Applied Geology
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record