In response to: Cook C. How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation? [1]

Abstract

I’d like to thank James Dunning, Anita Gross, Charlie Goldsmith, Toby Hall, Ken Olson, Valerie Phelps, Philip Sizer Jr, and Jean-Michel Brismée, for contributing their invited responses to my recent editorial titled ‘How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation’. I invited these individuals because I appreciate their contributions toward policy, evidence, and teaching, and desired to fully represent multiple viewpoints. As you can see by the responses, thoughts regarding the continued debate of thrust versus non-thrust are as polarizing as ever, and based on these responses, one can see that one answer does not fully cover all the questions on this issue.