Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNowak, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorPreston, Alison
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T14:22:24Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T14:22:24Z
dc.date.created2008-11-12T23:36:25Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.citationNowak, Margaret J. and Preston, Alison C. (2000) Can human capital theory explain why nurses are so poorly paid?, Women's Economic Policy Analysis Unit (WEPAU) Discussion Paper Series: no. 00/2, Curtin University of Technology, School of Economics and Finance.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38518
dc.description.abstract

This paper uses Australian Census data to examine the earnings of femaleprofessionals. Comparisons are made between Registered Nurses (RNs),Teachers, Social Professionals, Health Professionals and BusinessProfessionals. Wage decompositions show that RNs earn significantly less thanother female Professionals and that the observed differentials cannot beexplained by differences in human capital endowments. The evidence presentedis strongly suggestive of monopsonist or oligopsonist power in the setting ofnurse wages ? with a manifestation being persistent labour marketdisequilibrium. Changing the relative reward structure for nurses may helpaddress the on-going nursing ?shortage? in Australia, although further researchin this area is called for.

dc.publisherCurtin University of Technology
dc.titleCan human capital theory explain why nurses are so poorly paid?
dc.typeWorking Paper
dcterms.source.volume07
dcterms.source.monthapr
dcterms.source.seriesWomen's Economic Policy Analysis Unit (WEPAU) Discussion Paper Series
curtin.departmentSchool of Economics and Finance
curtin.identifierEPR-3048
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyCurtin Business School
curtin.facultySchool of Economics and Finance


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record