Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilkins, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T14:22:59Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T14:22:59Z
dc.date.created2016-01-10T20:00:25Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationWilkins, P. 2015. Watchdogs as satellites of parliament. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 75 (1): pp. 18-27.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38551
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1467-8500.12142
dc.description.abstract

Australian legislation indicates a special relationship between Parliament and independent watchdogs such as the Auditor General and Ombudsman. These statutory provisions are reviewed and a new model conceptualizing watchdogs as satellites of Parliament is presented and assessed in the context of the debate about where these watchdogs fit in our system of government. The model assists consideration of the interdependence of Parliaments and watchdogs and tensions in the relationship. It is identified that giving primacy to the relationship with Parliament mitigates some risks and creates others, and that it provides a democratic legitimacy to the watchdogs. The article concludes that there can be benefits to the community where primacy of the role of Parliament is embedded in legislation.

dc.titleWatchdogs as satellites of parliament
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume-
dcterms.source.startPage---
dcterms.source.issn0313-6647
dcterms.source.titleAustralian Journal of Public Administration
curtin.departmentJohn Curtin Institute of Public Policy (JCIPP)
curtin.accessStatusOpen access via publisher


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record