Curtin University Homepage
  • Library
  • Help
    • Admin

    espace - Curtin’s institutional repository

    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item

    Subsidiarity as Judicial and Legislative Review Principles in the European Union

    Access Status
    Fulltext not available
    Authors
    Moens, Gabriel
    Trone, J.
    Date
    2014
    Type
    Book Chapter
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Moens, G. and Trone, J. 2014. Subsidiarity as Judicial and Legislative Review Principles in the European Union, in Evans, M. and Zimmermann, A. (ed), Global Perspectives on Subsidiarity, pp. 157-184. Dordrecht Netherlands: Springer.
    Source Title
    Global Perspectives on Subsidiarity
    ISBN
    9789401788090
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38686
    Collection
    • Curtin Research Publications
    Abstract

    The founding Treaties of the European Union make clear that subsidiarity is a judicially enforceable legal principle. However, the case law of the Court of Justice reveals that the enforcement of subsidiarity as a judicial principle has been ineffective. The Court has applied a very weak standard of review for both substantive and procedural compliance with the subsidiarity principle. By far the most significant application of the subsidiarity principle is its consideration as part of the EU legislative process. A Member State legislature may issue a reasoned opinion regarding subsidiarity aspects of a proposal. These reasoned opinions may trigger the yellow card procedure, forcing the Commission to review its proposal, or the orange card procedure, where the Parliament or Council can block the proposal. These procedures have some potential as legislative safeguards of subsidiarity: in 2013 the Commission withdrew a legislative proposal after the yellow card procedure was activated.

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • The use of the principle of subsidiarity in the reformation of Australia’s Federal system of government
      Evans, Michelle (2012)
      Australia’s federal system of government is established by the structure of the Constitution which provides for a central federal government and six state governments. When the Constitution was originally drafted, the ...
    • Immaterial Copying in the Age of Access
      Foong, Cheryl (2022)
      Access models for dissemination of content are increasingly prevalent, yet Australian copyright law does not adequately distinguish background copying from public access to expression. The scope of the reproduction right ...
    • Subsidiarity and Federalism: A Case Study of the Australian Constitution and Its Interpretation
      Evans, Michelle (2014)
      Since the landmark decision of the Australian High Court in the Enginee1:1• case, the Australian federation has become increasingly centralised to the extent that Australia has become less than an authentic federation. ...
    Advanced search

    Browse

    Communities & CollectionsIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument TypeThis CollectionIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument Type

    My Account

    Admin

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Follow Curtin

    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 

    CRICOS Provider Code: 00301JABN: 99 143 842 569TEQSA: PRV12158

    Copyright | Disclaimer | Privacy statement | Accessibility

    Curtin would like to pay respect to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander members of our community by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land on which the Perth campus is located, the Whadjuk people of the Nyungar Nation; and on our Kalgoorlie campus, the Wongutha people of the North-Eastern Goldfields.