Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTampin, Brigitte
dc.contributor.authorSlater, Helen
dc.contributor.authorHall, Toby
dc.contributor.authorLee, G.
dc.contributor.authorBriffa, Kathy
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T14:29:47Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T14:29:47Z
dc.date.created2012-11-28T20:00:26Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationTampin, Brigitte and Slater, Helen and Hall, Toby and Lee, Gabriel and Briffa, Noelle Kathryn. 2012. Quantitative sensory testing somatosensory profiles in patients with cervical radiculopathy are distinct from those in patients with nonspecific neck–arm pain. Pain. 153 (12): pp. 2403-2414.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/39047
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pain.2012.08.007
dc.description.abstract

The aim of this study was to establish the somatosensory profiles of patients with cervical radiculopathy and patients with nonspecific neck–arm pain associated with heightened nerve mechanosensitivity (NSNAP). Sensory profiles were compared to healthy control (HC) subjects and a positive control group comprising patients with fibromyalgia (FM). Quantitative sensory testing (QST) of thermal and mechanical detection and pain thresholds, pain sensitivity and responsiveness to repetitive noxious mechanical stimulation was performed in the maximal pain area, the corresponding dermatome and foot of 23 patients with painful C6 or C7 cervical radiculopathy, 8 patients with NSNAP in a C6/7 dermatomal pain distribution, 31 HC and 22 patients with FM. For both neck–arm pain groups, all QST parameters were within the 95% confidence interval of HC data. Patients with cervical radiculopathy were characterised by localised loss of function (thermal, mechanical, vibration detection P < 0.009) in the maximal pain area and dermatome (thermal detection, vibration detection, pressure pain sensitivity P < 0.04), consistent with peripheral neuronal damage. Both neck–arm pain groups demonstrated increased cold sensitivity in their maximal pain area (P < 0.03) and the foot (P < 0.009), and this was also the dominant sensory characteristic in patients with NSNAP. Both neck–arm pain groups differed from patients with FM, the latter characterised by a widespread gain of function in most nociceptive parameters (thermal, pressure, mechanical pain sensitivity P < 0.027). Despite commonalities in pain characteristics between the 2 neck–arm pain groups, distinct sensory profiles were demonstrated for each group.

dc.publisherElsevier Science
dc.titleQuantitative sensory testing somatosensory profiles in patients with cervical radiculopathy are distinct from those in patients with nonspecific neck–arm pain
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume153
dcterms.source.number12
dcterms.source.startPage2403
dcterms.source.endPage2414
dcterms.source.issn03043959
dcterms.source.titlePain
curtin.note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Pain. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Pain, Vol. 153, No. 12 (2012). DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.08.007

curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record