Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVan Klinken, R.
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, D.
dc.contributor.authorParr, R.
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Todd
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, L.
dc.identifier.citationVan Klinken, Rieks D. and Shepherd, Damian and Parr, Rob and Robinson, Todd and Anderson, Linda. 2007. Mapping mesquite (Prosopis) distribution and density using visual aerial surveys. Rangeland Ecology and Management. 60 (4): pp. 408-416.

Mapping the distribution and abundance of invasive plants is a high priority, but establishing cost-effective and practical techniques at appropriate scales remains elusive. Mesquite is a highly invasive shrub that cannot currently be reliably distinguished from other plant species using remote sensing technologies, at least not at accuracies necessary for mapping mesquite at very low densities. This paper describes and tests an alternative method. A visual, aerial technique was used to map a large mesquite (Leguminoseae: Prosopis spp.) population in Australia; 216 654 ha was surveyed in 18.5-ha grid cells to include the entire population. The objective was to test the ability of this technique to detect and map mesquite at very low densities for surveillance and to assist in prioritizing management effort and, where mesquite was well established, to categorize mesquite into broad canopy cover classes for change detection and to identify habitat associations.The survey technique was very effective at detecting isolated mesquite plants (< 0.6% canopy cover across a grid cell), which is considerably better than existing remote sensing technologies. Detection of low-density mesquite was particularly important, as most occupied grid cells (55%) had isolated mesquite, and their management may offer the best return on investment. The technique was also competitive cost wise ($0.39 USD per hectare) and required relatively little expertise. Grid cells with moderate (20%-50%) to dense (> 50%) canopy covers were almost all restricted to a 32,500-ha area on the floodplain delta of the Fortescue River, where the original introductions occurred. Cover class estimates appeared to be well calibrated between observers within a survey; however, they were poorly calibrated between independently conducted surveys, suggesting that further methodological refinement is necessary if this technique is to be reliable for change detection.

dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.subjectmonitoring costs
dc.subjectvisual estimation techniques
dc.subjectaerial survey
dc.subjectinvasive plants
dc.subjectremote sensing
dc.titleMapping mesquite (Prosopis) distribution and density using visual aerial surveys
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.titleRangeland Ecology and Management
curtin.departmentDepartment of Spatial Sciences
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record