Curtin University Homepage
  • Library
  • Help
    • Admin

    espace - Curtin’s institutional repository

    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item

    High water mark determination based on the wave runup height distribution and spatial continuity

    Access Status
    Fulltext not available
    Authors
    Liu, X.
    Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia)
    Wright, Graeme
    Mahoney, R.
    Arnold, L.
    Date
    2011
    Type
    Conference Paper
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Liu, Xin and Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia) and Wright, Graeme and Mahoney, Ric and Arnold, Lesley. 2011. High water mark determination based on the wave runup height distribution and spatial continuity, in Proceedings of the Coasts & Ports 2011: Diverse and Developing, Sep 28-30 2011, pp. 442-427. Perth, WA: Local Organising Committee.
    Source Title
    Proceedings of Coasts and Ports 2011
    Source Conference
    Coasts and Ports 2011
    Additional URLs
    http://search.informit.com.au/fullText;dn=709147548539720;res=IELENG
    ISBN
    9780858258860
    School
    Department of Spatial Sciences
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/39551
    Collection
    • Curtin Research Publications
    Abstract

    Determination of High Water Mark (HWM) is important for identifying the landward extent of the ocean. The delineation of HWM is required for cadastral boundary definition, land use and infrastructure development along the foreshore and for planning associated with climate change adaptation. Currently, apart from medium to long term traditional tidal observation methods and subjective interpretation, only limited scientific methods have been developed to determine HWM accurately. The aim of this paper is to develop a systematic method to determine HWM based on the HWM indicators, wave runup distribution and the spatial continuity theory (See Figure 1). A range of HWM indicators are used to determine HWM in this paper including the Mean Higher High Water (MHHW); suggested heights determined by Landgate experienced surveyors in the field (Landgate) and the engineer in Department of Transport (DoT); Highest Tide Records (HTR) derived from tidal records, and natural features on the beach such as sudden change of beach slope (SCoS) and the High Water Line (HWL, boundary between wet sand and dry sand). In order to extract these feature indicator lines, Object-Oriented Image Analysis (OOIA) is used in this research. The heights of HWM indicators are then derived from Digital Elevation Model (DEM) to determine HWM indicator line.To determine HWM based on these indicators for cadastral boundary definition purpose, we develop a method derived from a semivariogram model of wave runup probability. The wave runup probability is defined as the probability that sea water will reach the indicator line in 8 years. Generally the higher the wave runup probability, the more likely sea water reaches the indicator. Cross sections are set up at every 50 meters in the study area and intersect with calculated indicator lines. The wave runup probability was calculated for each intersection point. A semivariogram model of these wave runup probabilities is used to understand spatial continuity of the wave runup on the shore. The semivariogram describe the spatial autocorrelation of wave runup probability of indicator points. Our assumption is that a semivariogram model can define HWM based on the probability of indicator points due to wave runup. The intersection points that are closer will usually have a smaller difference of wave runup probability than distant ones. We aim to identify the maximum distance between pairs of points, which defines the maximum neighbourhood over which wave runup probability should be continue on the shore. This study showed that the height, reached by wave runup equal as 2.5% of the time over 8 years, was the most proper level that could be considered as the HWM height, as the distance between upper (97.5%) and lower (2.5%) bound of this level, when levelling on the ground, was the closest to the autocorrelation range on the shore.

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • High Water Mark Determination Based on the Principle of Spatial Continuity of the Swash Probability
      Liu, Xin; Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia); Blenkinsopp, C.; Arnold, L.; Wright, Graeme (2014)
      This study presents a model that determines the position of the high water mark (HWM) based on the spatial continuityof inundation probability due to swash for a range of HWM indicators. These indicators include mean high ...
    • Assessment of spatial and temporal variations of high water mark indicators
      Liu, Xin; Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia); Kuhn, Michael; Wright, Graeme; Arnold, Lesley (2013)
      The high water mark (HWM) is commonly used as a boundary for coastal management and planning. Due to the dynamic nature of the coastal environment, the determination of HWM can be difficult and may vary based on the ...
    • Multi-Criteria Decision Making on the position of High Water Mark
      Liu, Xin; Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia); Wright, Graeme; Arnold, Lesley; Liu, Q. (2014)
      As a cadastral boundary to separate water and land, the HighWater Mark (HWM) is important for coastal management and planning. However, contemporary research has failed to reach consensus on methods for HWM determination ...
    Advanced search

    Browse

    Communities & CollectionsIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument TypeThis CollectionIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument Type

    My Account

    Admin

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Follow Curtin

    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 

    CRICOS Provider Code: 00301JABN: 99 143 842 569TEQSA: PRV12158

    Copyright | Disclaimer | Privacy statement | Accessibility

    Curtin would like to pay respect to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander members of our community by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land on which the Perth campus is located, the Whadjuk people of the Nyungar Nation; and on our Kalgoorlie campus, the Wongutha people of the North-Eastern Goldfields.