Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFernandez, R.
dc.contributor.authorDavidson, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, R.
dc.contributor.authorJuergens, c.
dc.contributor.authorStafford, B.
dc.contributor.authorSalamonson, Y.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T14:39:21Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T14:39:21Z
dc.date.created2010-02-25T20:02:37Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationFernandez, Ritin and Davidson, Patricia and Griffiths, Rhonda and Juergens, Craig and Stafford, Bruce and Salamonson, Yenna. 2009. A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing a health-related lifestyle self-management intervention with standard cardiac rehabilitation following an acute cardiac event: Implications for a larger clinical trial. Australian Critical Care. 22 (1): pp. 17-27.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40056
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aucc.2008.10.003
dc.description.abstract

Summary. Purpose: This pilot study was to assess the feasibility of the health-related lifestyle self-management (HeLM) intervention as a strategy to decrease cardiovascular risk following acute coronary syndrome. Methods: Participants in this randomised controlled trial were recruited from a tertiary teaching hospital in metropolitan Sydney Australia. The multifaceted HeLM intervention, using the principles of the transtheoretical model, involved the use of bibliotherapy, a structured evidence-based approach to cardiovascular risk reduction, a communication strategy with general practitioners, three supportive telephone calls to participants and provision of behavioural prompts and a health record diary. Differences in behavioural and clinical outcomes between the HeLM intervention group (n=29) and the standard cardiac rehabilitation group (n=22) were assessed.Results: A total of 125 participants screened were eligible for participation in the study. Fifty-one participants, mean age 57 years (+8.78) were randomised. At the 8-week follow up, participants in the HeLM intervention group had a reduced systolic blood pressure compared to the standard care group (120.3 S.D.: 16.3 vs. 126.4 S.D.: 14.6). There were no significant differences in diastolic blood pressure and cholesterol levels between the two groups. Participants in both the intervention and control group had a reduction in waist circumference although when compared to baseline values, women in the HeLM intervention group had a greater reduction compared to those receiving standard care. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with this intervention. Conclusions: Findings support the feasibility of implementing the health-related lifestyle self-management intervention for risk factor modification in patients with acute coronary syndrome. An adequately powered randomised controlled trial is required to test the impact of the intervention on cardiovascular risk reduction.

dc.publisherElsevier Inc
dc.subjectAcute coronary syndrome
dc.subjectSecondary prevention
dc.subjectTranstheoretical model
dc.subjectFeasibility study
dc.subjectBrief intervention
dc.titleA pilot randomised controlled trial comparing a health-related lifestyle self-management intervention with standard cardiac rehabilitation following an acute cardiac event: Implications for a larger clinical trial
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume22
dcterms.source.startPage17
dcterms.source.endPage27
dcterms.source.issn1036-7314
dcterms.source.titleAustralian Critical Care
curtin.note

The link to the journal’s home page is: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.authors/710660/description#description. Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
curtin.facultyCentre for Cardiovascular and Chronic Care
curtin.facultyNursing and Midwifery Sydney


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record