Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHeine, S.
dc.contributor.authorHamamura, Takeshi
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T14:45:42Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T14:45:42Z
dc.date.created2015-09-29T02:03:56Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationHeine, S. and Hamamura, T. 2007. In Search of East Asian Self-Enhancement. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 11: pp. 4-27.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40792
dc.description.abstract

meta-analysis of published cross-cultural studies of self-enhancement reveals pervasive and pronounced differences between East Asians and Westerners. Across 91 comparisons, the average cross-cultural effect was d = .84. The effect emerged in all 30 methods, except for comparisons of implicit self-esteem. Within cultures, Westerners showed a clear self-serving bias (d = .87), whereas East Asians did not (d = –.01), with Asian Americans falling in between (d = .52). East Asians did self-enhance in the methods that involved comparing themselves to average but were self-critical in other methods. It was hypothesized that this inconsistency could be explained in that these methods are compromised by the “everyone is better than their group’s average effect” (EBTA). Supporting this rationale, studies that were implicated by the EBTA reported significantly larger self-enhancement effect for all cultures compared to other studies. Overall, the evidence converges to show that East Asians do not self-enhance.

dc.publisherSage Publications Inc.
dc.subjectculture/ethnicity
dc.subjectself/identity
dc.subjectself-presentation
dc.titleIn Search of East Asian Self-Enhancement
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume11
dcterms.source.startPage4
dcterms.source.endPage27
dcterms.source.issn10888683
dcterms.source.titlePersonality and Social Psychology Review
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record