Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHidalgo, B.
dc.contributor.authorDetrembleur, C.
dc.contributor.authorHall, Toby
dc.contributor.authorMahaudens, P.
dc.contributor.authorNielens, H.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T14:50:27Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T14:50:27Z
dc.date.created2014-06-16T20:00:17Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationHidalgo, B. and Detrembleur, C. and Hall, T. and Mahaudens, P. and Nielens, H. 2014. The efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for different stages of non-specific low back pain: an update of systematic reviews. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy. 22 (2): pp. 59-74.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/41312
dc.identifier.doi10.1179/2042618613Y.0000000041
dc.description.abstract

Objective: to review and update the evidence for different forms of manual therapy (MT) for patients with different stages of non-specific low back pain (LBP).Data sources: MEDLINE, Cochrane-Register-of-Controlled-Trials, PEDro, EMBASE. Method: A systematic review of MT with a literature search covering the period of January 2000 to April 2013 was conducted by two independent reviewers according to Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. A total of 360 studies were evaluated using qualitative criteria. Two stages of LBP were categorized; combined acute–subacute and chronic. Further sub-classification was made according to MT intervention: MT1 (manipulation); MT2 (mobilization and soft-tissue-techniques); and MT3 (MT1 combined with MT2). In each sub-category, MT could be combined or not with exercise or usual medical care (UMC). Consequently, quantitative evaluation criteria were applied to 56 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and hence 23 low-risk of bias RCTs were identified for review. Only studies providing new updated information (11/23 RCTs) are presented here.Results: Acute–subacute LBP: STRONG-evidence in favour of MT1 when compared to sham for pain, function and health improvements in the short-term (1–3 months). MODERATE-evidence to support MT1 and MT3 combined with UMC in comparison to UMC alone for pain, function and health improvements in the short-term. Chronic LBP: MODERATE to STRONG-evidence in favour of MT1 in comparison to sham for pain, function and overall-health in the short-term. MODERATE-evidence in favour of MT3 combined with exercise or UMC in comparison to exercise and back-school was established for pain, function and quality-of-life in the short and long-term. LIMITED-evidence in favour of MT2 combined with exercise and UMC in comparison to UMC alone for pain and function from short to long-term. LIMITED-evidence of no effect for MT1 with extension-exercise compared to extension-exercise alone for pain in the short to long-term. Conclusion: This systematic review updates the evidence for MT with exercise or UMC for different stages of LBP and provides recommendations for future studies.

dc.publisherManey Publishing
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trails
dc.subjectmanual therapy
dc.subjectspinal manipulation
dc.subjectefficacy
dc.subjectNon-specific low back pain
dc.titleThe efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for different stages of non-specific low back pain: an update of systematic reviews
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume22
dcterms.source.number2
dcterms.source.startPage59
dcterms.source.endPage74
dcterms.source.issn1066-9817
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy
curtin.note

http://www.maneypublishing.com/

curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record