Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZheng, S.
dc.contributor.authorBloch, Harry
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T14:53:02Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T14:53:02Z
dc.date.created2014-05-19T20:00:18Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationZheng, S. and Bloch, H. 2014. Australia’s Mining Productivity Decline: Implications for MFP Measurement. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 41 (2): pp. 201-212.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/41561
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11123-012-0329-4
dc.description.abstract

This paper investigates the mining sector’s poor productivity performance as measured by the growth accounting formula for multifactor productivity (MFP) index during the recent mining boom in Australia. We provide an alternative measure of productivity growth by estimating a translog variable cost function, with parameters that separate productivity growth due to technical change from that due to the effects of returns to scale, capacity utilisation and natural resource inputs. The results show that the average MFP growth in Australian mining based on the dual cost-function measure of technical change is 2 % over the sample period 1974–1975 to 2007–2008, rather than -0.2 % from the published index. The difference arises because declining natural resource inputs, the effects of capacity utilisation and returns to scale have all reduced the ‘true’ MFP growth.

dc.publisherSpringer New York LLC
dc.subjectMeasurement
dc.subjectMining
dc.subjectProductivity
dc.titleAustralia’s Mining Productivity Decline: Implications for MFP Measurement
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume41
dcterms.source.startPage201
dcterms.source.endPage212
dcterms.source.issn0895-562X
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Productivity Analysis
curtin.note

The final publication is available at Springer via http://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-012-0329-4

curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record