Omitting follow-up food after initial hypoglycaemic treatment does not increase the likelihood of repeat hypoglycaemia
dc.contributor.author | Vindedzis, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Marsh, B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sherriff, Jillian | |
dc.contributor.author | Dhaliwal, Satvinder | |
dc.contributor.author | Stanton, K. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T14:54:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T14:54:53Z | |
dc.date.created | 2013-09-23T20:01:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vindedzis, Sally and Marsh, Beryl and Sherriff, Jillian and Dhaliwal, Satvinder and Stanton, Kim. 2013. Omitting follow-up food after initial hypoglycaemic treatment does not increase the likelihood of repeat hypoglycaemia. Diabetes Therapy. 4: pp. 67-75. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/41731 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s13300-013-0019-x | |
dc.description.abstract |
Introduction: Guidelines for self-treatment of hypoglycaemia specify initial treatment with quick-acting carbohydrate until blood glucose levels normalize and then follow-up with longer-acting carbohydrate. The few studies investigating follow-up show 29–57% omission or undertreatment with follow-up carbohydrate but do not investigate the association of this with repeat hypoglycaemia. This study aimed to develop, validate and administer a questionnaire to delineate this association. The timeframe targeted was 2 h post primary hypoglycaemic event (PPHE), the time influenced by long-acting carbohydrate. Methods: A questionnaire was generated, test–retest reliability assessed, and it was piloted on convenience samples from the target population. The final version was administered to all insulin-treated individuals attending an outpatient diabetes clinic over 4 weeks (169).Results: Questionnaire development: readability (69.6—standard/easy), test–retest reliability (Cohen’s kappa 0.57–0.91) and return rate (72.2%) were all acceptable. Questionnaire data: questionnaires were returned by 122 participants (63 males/59 females). Method of insulin administration was subcutaneous insulin injections (91%) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) (9%). Repeat hypoglycaemia within 2 h PPHE was reported by 8.2% of respondents. There was no significant difference for age, gender and diabetes duration between those reporting repeat hypoglycaemia and those without. Consumption of follow-up longer-acting carbohydrate was reported by 58.2% of responders with 48% of these using long-acting and 52% medium-acting carbohydrate foods. Method of insulin administration and consumption of follow-up food were significantly associated with repeat hypoglycaemia (P = 0.015, 0.039) but presence or absence of symptoms and duration of action of carbohydrate were not significantly associated (P = 0.103, 0.629). Hierarchical logistic regression analysis showed omission of follow-up food PPHE was not a significant predictor of increased likelihood of repeat hypoglycaemia within 2 h PPHE, irrespective of method of insulin administration (P = 0.085). Conclusion: This study supports guidelines that recommend judicious, rather than routine use of follow-up longer-acting carbohydrate PPHE. | |
dc.publisher | Springer Healthcare Communications Ltd | |
dc.title | Omitting follow-up food after initial hypoglycaemic treatment does not increase the likelihood of repeat hypoglycaemia | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 4 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 67 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 75 | |
dcterms.source.issn | 1869-6961 | |
dcterms.source.title | Diabetes Therapy | |
curtin.note |
This article is published under the Open Access publishing model and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License | |
curtin.department | ||
curtin.accessStatus | Open access |