Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBirch, E.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T14:55:15Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T14:55:15Z
dc.date.created2011-11-18T01:21:19Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationBirch, Elisa and Miller, Paul. 2006. HECS and HECS-HELP: equity Issues. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 28 (2): pp. 97-119.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/41766
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13600800600750921
dc.description.abstract

There have been many changes to the Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS) since itsintroduction in 1989. The most significant of these is possibly the reforms announced in the 2003Federal Budget, which allow universities to increase the contributions required of students by up to25%. This paper considers the distribution of deferred HECS liabilities according to thesocioeconomic status of students. An algorithm is presented for converting area-level data to itsindividual-level equivalent. It is found that students of lower socioeconomic status defer a muchlarger proportion of their HECS than students of higher socioeconomic status. The adverse sideeffects of HECS identified in the literature will therefore be more acute for low socioeconomicstatus background students than for their wealthier counterparts.

dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.titleHECS and HECS-HELP: equity Issues
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume28
dcterms.source.number2
dcterms.source.startPage97
dcterms.source.endPage119
dcterms.source.issn1360-080X
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Higher Education Policy and Management
curtin.departmentSchool of Economics and Finance
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record