Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRolli Salathé, C.
dc.contributor.authorMelloh, Markus
dc.contributor.authorKälin, W.
dc.contributor.authorSemmer, N.
dc.contributor.authorRoth, M.
dc.contributor.authorMüller, U.
dc.contributor.authorElfering, A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T14:59:48Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T14:59:48Z
dc.date.created2015-12-10T04:26:11Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationRolli Salathé, C. and Melloh, M. and Kälin, W. and Semmer, N. and Roth, M. and Müller, U. and Elfering, A. 2013. Comparison of pain-resilient working individuals to population-based case controls with/without momentary low back pain. European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom). 17 (9): pp. 1411-1421.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/42450
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00319.x
dc.description.abstract

Background: Few studies have examined the 20% of individuals who never experience an episode of low back pain (LBP). To date, no investigation has been undertaken that examines a group who claim to have never experienced LBP in their lifetime in comparison to two population-based case-control groups with and without momentary LBP. This study investigates whether LBP-resilient workers between 50 and 65 years had better general health, demonstrated more positive health behaviour and were better able to achieve routine activities compared with both case-control groups. Methods: Forty-two LBP-resilient participants completed the same pain assessment questionnaire as a population-based LBP sample from a nationwide, large-scale cross-sectional survey in Switzerland. The LBP-resilient participants were pairwise compared to the propensity score-matched case controls by exploring differences in demographic and work characteristics, and by calculating odds ratios (ORs) and effect sizes. A discriminant analysis explored group differences, while the multiple logistic regression analysis specified single indicators which accounted for group differences. Results: LBP-resilient participants were healthier than the case controls with momentary LBP and achieved routine activities more easily. Compared to controls without momentary LBP, LBP-resilient participants had a higher vitality, a lower workload, a healthier attitude towards health and behaved more healthily by drinking less alcohol. Conclusions: By demonstrating a difference between LBP-resilient participants and controls without momentary LBP, the question that arises is what additional knowledge can be attained. Three underlying traits seem to be relevant about LBP-resilient participants: personality, favourable work conditions and subjective attitudes/attributions towards health. These rationales have to be considered with respect to LBP prevention. © 2013 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters.

dc.titleComparison of pain-resilient working individuals to population-based case controls with/without momentary low back pain
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume17
dcterms.source.number9
dcterms.source.startPage1411
dcterms.source.endPage1421
dcterms.source.issn1090-3801
dcterms.source.titleEuropean Journal of Pain (United Kingdom)
curtin.departmentCurtin Medical School
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record