Comparison of pain-resilient working individuals to population-based case controls with/without momentary low back pain
dc.contributor.author | Rolli Salathé, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Melloh, Markus | |
dc.contributor.author | Kälin, W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Semmer, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Roth, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Müller, U. | |
dc.contributor.author | Elfering, A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T14:59:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T14:59:48Z | |
dc.date.created | 2015-12-10T04:26:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Rolli Salathé, C. and Melloh, M. and Kälin, W. and Semmer, N. and Roth, M. and Müller, U. and Elfering, A. 2013. Comparison of pain-resilient working individuals to population-based case controls with/without momentary low back pain. European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom). 17 (9): pp. 1411-1421. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/42450 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00319.x | |
dc.description.abstract |
Background: Few studies have examined the 20% of individuals who never experience an episode of low back pain (LBP). To date, no investigation has been undertaken that examines a group who claim to have never experienced LBP in their lifetime in comparison to two population-based case-control groups with and without momentary LBP. This study investigates whether LBP-resilient workers between 50 and 65 years had better general health, demonstrated more positive health behaviour and were better able to achieve routine activities compared with both case-control groups. Methods: Forty-two LBP-resilient participants completed the same pain assessment questionnaire as a population-based LBP sample from a nationwide, large-scale cross-sectional survey in Switzerland. The LBP-resilient participants were pairwise compared to the propensity score-matched case controls by exploring differences in demographic and work characteristics, and by calculating odds ratios (ORs) and effect sizes. A discriminant analysis explored group differences, while the multiple logistic regression analysis specified single indicators which accounted for group differences. Results: LBP-resilient participants were healthier than the case controls with momentary LBP and achieved routine activities more easily. Compared to controls without momentary LBP, LBP-resilient participants had a higher vitality, a lower workload, a healthier attitude towards health and behaved more healthily by drinking less alcohol. Conclusions: By demonstrating a difference between LBP-resilient participants and controls without momentary LBP, the question that arises is what additional knowledge can be attained. Three underlying traits seem to be relevant about LBP-resilient participants: personality, favourable work conditions and subjective attitudes/attributions towards health. These rationales have to be considered with respect to LBP prevention. © 2013 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters. | |
dc.title | Comparison of pain-resilient working individuals to population-based case controls with/without momentary low back pain | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 17 | |
dcterms.source.number | 9 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 1411 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 1421 | |
dcterms.source.issn | 1090-3801 | |
dcterms.source.title | European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom) | |
curtin.department | Curtin Medical School | |
curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |