Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRamadaniati, H.
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ya Ping
dc.contributor.authorHughes, J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T15:01:42Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T15:01:42Z
dc.date.created2016-08-21T19:30:41Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationRamadaniati, H. and Lee, Y.P. and Hughes, J. 2014. Pharmacists' active interventions in a children's hospital: an Australian context, in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American-College-of-Clinical-Pharmacy (ACCP), Oct 12-15 2014. Austin, Texas: ACCP.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/42728
dc.description.abstract

PURPOSE: This study documented pharmacists’ active interventions leading to changes in drug therapy in order to (i) compare the nature of clinical pharmacists’ active interventions made in different practice settings within a children’s hospital, and (ii) identify the predictors for physician acceptance of the interventions. METHODS: The primary investigator observed and documented all clinical interventions performed by clinical pharmacists for between 35 – 37 days on five study wards. The rates and types of pharmacists’ interventions on the different wards were then com- pared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis using SPSS version 22.0 was performed to identify the predictors of physician acceptance of the interventions. RESULTS: The Hematology-Oncology Ward had a higher rate of active interventions (2.43 interventions per 100 medication orders) compared to general medical settings and general surgical setting. Active interventions contributed for less than a quarter of all interventions on the general medical and surgical wards com- pared to nearly half (46.2%, p < 0.001) on the specialty Hematology-Oncology Ward. Dose adjustment was the most frequent active interventions in the general settings, whilst drug addition constituted the most common active interventions on the Hematology-Oncology Ward. The degree of acceptance of pharmacists’ intervention by physicians was high (90% for active interventions). There were three variables significantly predicting the intervention acceptance, namely patients’ age (OR = 0.893; 95% CI 0.813, 0.981), non high-risk medication category (OR = 2.801; 95% CI 1.094, 7.169), and pharmacists’ experience (OR = 1.114; 95% CI 1.033, 1.200). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of pharmacists’ active interventions documented on Hematology-Oncology Ward was higher than the general medical and surgical wards. The pattern of the interventions documented on Hematology-Oncology Ward was also different compared to that of other wards. The interventions involving younger patients, addressing non high-risk medication related problems, being recommended by more experienced pharmacists were associated with increased likelihood of acceptance by physicians.

dc.titlePharmacists' active interventions in a children's hospital: an Australian context.
dc.typeConference Paper
dcterms.source.volume34
dcterms.source.startPageE287
dcterms.source.endPageE288
dcterms.source.issn0277-0008
dcterms.source.titlePHARMACOTHERAPY
dcterms.source.seriesPHARMACOTHERAPY
dcterms.source.conferenceAnnual Meeting of the American-College-of-Clinical-Pharmacy (ACCP)
curtin.departmentSchool of Pharmacy
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record