Do patients with long-term side effects of cancer treatment benefits from general practitioner support? A literature review.
dc.contributor.author | Ngune, Irene | |
dc.contributor.author | Jiwa, Moyez | |
dc.contributor.author | McManus, Alexandra | |
dc.contributor.author | Hughes, Jeff | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T15:08:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T15:08:32Z | |
dc.date.created | 2015-08-11T20:00:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ngune, I. and Jiwa, M. and McManus, A. and Hughes, J. 2015. Do patients with long-term side effects of cancer treatment benefits from general practitioner support? A literature review. International Journal of Integrated Care. 15: Article ID (e023). | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43576 | |
dc.description.abstract |
Background: Alongside specialist cancer clinics, general practitioners have an important role in cancer patients’ follow-up care, yet no literature summarises the nature, extent and impact of their involvement. This paper addresses this issue through a review of the literature. Methods: Studies were sourced from six academic databases - AustHealth (n = 202), CINAHL (n = 500), the Cochrane Library (reviews and trials; n = 200), Embase (n = 368), PHCRIS (n = 132) and PubMed/Medline (n = 410). Studies that focused on interventions designed for patients receiving follow-up care and reported cancer care provided by a general practitioner delivered alongside specialist care were reviewed. Results: A total of 19 papers were identified as relevant for this review (3 randomised control trials; 4 cross-sectional, 5 cohort and 3 qualitative studies, and 3 systematic reviews). The reviewed studies indicated that providing general practitioner-led supportive inter- ventions for post-treatment care of cancer patients is feasible and acceptable to patients. General practitioner involvement resulted in improved physical and psychosocial well-being of patients and continuity of care, especially for patients with concomitant health conditions. Conclusion: Involving general practitioners in post-treatment cancer care is beneficial to patients. However, proactive initiatives that encourage and facilitate patients to consult their general practitioner about their needs or symptoms of recurrence should be considered. | |
dc.publisher | International Foundation of Integrated Care | |
dc.relation.uri | http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/1987 | |
dc.subject | integrated care | |
dc.subject | supportive care | |
dc.subject | primary health care | |
dc.subject | follow-up care | |
dc.subject | cancer | |
dc.title | Do patients with long-term side effects of cancer treatment benefits from general practitioner support? A literature review. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 15 | |
dcterms.source.number | e023 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 1 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 19 | |
dcterms.source.issn | 1568-4156 | |
dcterms.source.title | International Journal of Integrated Care | |
curtin.note |
This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons license | |
curtin.department | School of Pharmacy | |
curtin.accessStatus | Open access | |
curtin.contributor.orcid | Ngune, Irene [0000-0003-4951-2712] |