Federalism in South Sudan—Options for Power Sharing in the Permanent Constitution
dc.contributor.author | de Villiers, Bertus | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T15:10:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T15:10:25Z | |
dc.date.created | 2016-11-17T19:30:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.citation | de Villiers, B. 2014. Federalism in South Sudan—Options for Power Sharing in the Permanent Constitution. Journal of Asian and African Studies. 49 (6): pp. 654-671. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43838 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0021909613507235 | |
dc.description.abstract |
© The Author(s) 2013.The young nation of South Sudan is currently engaged in a review of its Transitional Constitution with the aim of finalizing a Permanent Constitution by 2015. One of the key issues the subject of negotiations is whether the Permanent Constitution should contain power-sharing features and if so, whether those features should be formal or informal. While it is widely accepted that the Permanent Constitution will contain federal elements, this article gives consideration to the way in which formal and informal power-sharing arrangements that are found in federations such as Nigeria, South Africa and Ethiopia, could be employed by South Sudan. | |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications | |
dc.title | Federalism in South Sudan—Options for Power Sharing in the Permanent Constitution | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 49 | |
dcterms.source.number | 6 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 654 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 671 | |
dcterms.source.issn | 0021-9096 | |
dcterms.source.title | Journal of Asian and African Studies | |
curtin.department | Curtin Law School | |
curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |