Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorde Villiers, Bertus
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T15:10:25Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T15:10:25Z
dc.date.created2016-11-17T19:30:19Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationde Villiers, B. 2014. Federalism in South Sudan—Options for Power Sharing in the Permanent Constitution. Journal of Asian and African Studies. 49 (6): pp. 654-671.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43838
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0021909613507235
dc.description.abstract

© The Author(s) 2013.The young nation of South Sudan is currently engaged in a review of its Transitional Constitution with the aim of finalizing a Permanent Constitution by 2015. One of the key issues the subject of negotiations is whether the Permanent Constitution should contain power-sharing features and if so, whether those features should be formal or informal. While it is widely accepted that the Permanent Constitution will contain federal elements, this article gives consideration to the way in which formal and informal power-sharing arrangements that are found in federations such as Nigeria, South Africa and Ethiopia, could be employed by South Sudan.

dc.publisherSage Publications
dc.titleFederalism in South Sudan—Options for Power Sharing in the Permanent Constitution
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume49
dcterms.source.number6
dcterms.source.startPage654
dcterms.source.endPage671
dcterms.source.issn0021-9096
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Asian and African Studies
curtin.departmentCurtin Law School
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record