Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSteinhauser, G.
dc.contributor.authorAdlassnig, W.
dc.contributor.authorAhau Risch, J.
dc.contributor.authorAnderlini, E.
dc.contributor.authorArguriou, P.
dc.contributor.authorArmendariz, A.Z.
dc.contributor.authorBains, W.
dc.contributor.authoret al.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T10:38:50Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T10:38:50Z
dc.date.created2013-03-07T20:00:33Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationSteinhauser, Georg and Adlassnig, Wolfram and Risch, Jesaka and Anderlini, Serena and Arguriou, Petros and Armendariz, Aaron and Bains, William et al. 2012. Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 33 (5): pp. 359-376.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/4393
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11017-012-9233-1
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlands
dc.titlePeer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume33
dcterms.source.startPage351
dcterms.source.endPage376
dcterms.source.issn1386-7415
dcterms.source.titleTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics
curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record