Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMucina, Ladislav
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T15:11:22Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T15:11:22Z
dc.date.created2010-10-01T06:03:09Z
dc.date.issued1992
dc.identifier.citationMucina, L. 1992. An analysis of book review criteria and motivation. Journal of Vegetation Science 3(5): pp 715-718.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43975
dc.description.abstract

The book review process for multi-authored volumes such as symposia proceedings and compendia is analysed and discussed. The criteria used in book reviewing as listed by Keddy (1991) as well as a set of new ones have been screened in a selection of 142 multi-authored volumes reviewed in Ecology, Journal of Ecology, Vegetatio, and Journal of Vegetation Science. Too often many important book review criteria have not been taken into account at all. Use of a standard set of book review criteria is suggested to avoid personal bias as much as possible.

dc.relation.urihttp://www.jstor.org/stable/3235841
dc.titleAn analysis of book review criteria and motivation
dc.typeJournal Article
curtin.note

This item may be available from Professor Ladislav Mucina

curtin.note

Email: L.Mucina@curtin.edu.au

curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available
curtin.facultySchool of Agriculture and Environment
curtin.facultyFaculty of Science and Engineering
curtin.facultyDepartment of Environmental Biology


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record