Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIglauer, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorPaluszny, A.
dc.contributor.authorBlunt, M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T15:11:59Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T15:11:59Z
dc.date.created2014-06-17T20:00:16Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationIglauer, S. and Paluszny, A. and Blunt, M. 2013. Simultaneous oil recovery and residual gas storage: A pore-level analysis using in-situ X-ray micro-tomography. Fuel. 103: pp. 905-914.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44079
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.094
dc.description.abstract

We imaged sandstone cores at residual gas saturation (Sgr) with synchrotron radiation at a nominal resolution of (9 μm)3. We studied two three-phase flooding sequences: (1) gas injection into a core containing oil and initial water followed by a waterflood (gw process); (2) gas injection into a waterflooded core followed by another waterflood (wgw process). In the gw flood we measured a significantly higher Sgr (=20.6%; Sgr in the wgw flood was 5.3%) and a significantly lower residual oil saturation (Sor; Sor in the gw flood was 21.6% and Sor in the wgw flood was 29.3%). We also studied the size distribution of individual trapped clusters in the pore space. We found an approximately power-law distribution N ∝ s−τ with an exponent τ = 2.02–2.03 for the residual oil clusters and τ = 2.04 for the gas clusters in the gw flood. τ (=2.32) estimated for the gas clusters in the wgw process was significantly different. Furthermore, we calculated the surface area A–volume V relationships for the clusters. Again an approximate power-law relationship was observed, A ∝Vp with p ≈ 0.75. Moreover, in the gw flood sequence we identified oil layers sandwiched between the gas and water phases; we did not identify such oil layers in the wgw flood.These results have several important implications for oil recovery, carbon geo-sequestration and contaminant transport: (a) significantly more oil can be produced and much more gas can be stored using a gw flood; (b) cluster size distributions for residual oil or gas clusters in three-phase flow are similar to those observed in analogue two-phase flow; (c) there is a large cluster surface area available for dissolution of the residual phase into an aqueous phase; however, this surface area is significantly smaller than predicted by percolation theory (p ≈ 1), which implies that CO2 dissolution trapping and contamination of aquifers by hazardous organic solvents is slower than expected because of reduced interfacial contact areas.

dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.subjectcarbon geo-sequestration
dc.subjectresidual gas
dc.subjectEnhanced oil recovery
dc.subjectresidual oil
dc.titleSimultaneous oil recovery and residual gas storage: A pore-level analysis using in-situ X-ray micro-tomography
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume103
dcterms.source.startPage905
dcterms.source.endPage914
dcterms.source.issn0016-2361
dcterms.source.titleFuel
curtin.note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in the journal Fuel. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in the journal Fuel, Vol.103 (2013). DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.094

curtin.note

NOTE: Corrigendum published at http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.031

curtin.departmentDepartment of Petroleum Engineering
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record