Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaynton, A.
dc.contributor.authorChandler, B.
dc.contributor.authorJones, Franca
dc.contributor.authorNealon, Gareth
dc.contributor.authorOgden, Mark
dc.contributor.authorRadomirovic, Tomoko
dc.contributor.authorShimizu, G.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T15:12:09Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T15:12:09Z
dc.date.created2011-02-15T00:35:00Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationBaynton, Andrew and Chandler, Brett and Jones, Franca and Nealon, Gareth and Ogden, Mark and Radomirovic, Tomoko and Shimizu, George and Taylor, Jared. 2010. Phosphonate additives do not always inhibit crystallization. CrystEngComm. 13 (4): pp. 1090-1095.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44113
dc.identifier.doi10.1039/C0CE00338G
dc.description.abstract

This paper investigates crystal growth modifiers based on 1,3,5-substituted benzene derivatives. The results show that as expected, the phosphonated derivative inhibits calcite precipitation to a much greater degree than the analogous sulfonate. However, on barium sulfate, both molecules show some crystallization promotion behaviour, with the phosphonate being the more potent promoter overall. Thus, the functional group alone does not determine the impact the organic molecule will have on crystallization. This opens the way for additives that have dual purposes (inhibiting the crystallization of one phase while not impacting or promoting the crystallization of other phases).

dc.publisherThe Royal Society of Chemistry
dc.titlePhosphonate additives do not always inhibit crystallization
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume13
dcterms.source.number4
dcterms.source.startPage1090
dcterms.source.endPage1095
dcterms.source.issn14668033
dcterms.source.titleCrystEngComm
curtin.departmentDepartment of Applied Chemistry
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record